» Articles » PMID: 33182413

How Does a (Smart) Age-Friendly Ecosystem Look in a Post-Pandemic Society?

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Nov 13
PMID 33182413
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

COVID-19 has impacted not only the health of citizens, but also the various factors that make up our society, living environments, and ecosystems. This pandemic has shown that future living will need to be agile and flexible to adapt to the various changes in needs of societal populations. Digital technology has played an integral role during COVID-19, assisting various sectors of the community, and demonstrating that smart cities can provide opportunities to respond to many future societal challenges. In the decades ahead, the rise in aging populations will be one of these challenges, and one in which the needs and requirements between demographic cohorts will vary greatly. Although we need to create future smart age-friendly ecosystems to meet these needs, technology still does not feature in the WHO eight domains of an age-friendly city. This paper extends upon Marston and van Hoof's 'Smart Age-friendly Ecosystem' (SAfE) framework, and explores how digital technology, design hacking, and research approaches can be used to understand a smart age-friendly ecosystem in a post-pandemic society. By exploring a series of case studies and using real-life scenarios from the standpoint of COVID-19, we propose the 'Concept of Age-friendly Smart Ecologies (CASE)' framework. We provide an insight into a myriad of contemporary multi-disciplinary research, which are capable to initiate discussions and bring various actors together with a positive impact on future planning and development of age-friendly ecosystems. The strengths and limitations of this framework are outlined, with advantages evident in the opportunity for towns, regions/counties, provinces, and states to take an agile approach and work together in adopting and implement improvements for the greater benefits of residents and citizens.

Citing Articles

The application of innovative ecosystems to build resilient communities in response to major public health events.

La J, Li M, Liu X Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1348718.

PMID: 38726232 PMC: 11080986. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348718.


Digital Literacy Training for Low-Income Older Adults Through Undergraduate Community-Engaged Learning: Single-Group Pretest-Posttest Study.

Miller L, Callegari R, Abah T, Fann H JMIR Aging. 2024; 7:e51675.

PMID: 38599620 PMC: 11134247. DOI: 10.2196/51675.


Locked down by inequality: Older people and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Buffel T, Yarker S, Phillipson C, Lang L, Lewis C, Doran P Urban Stud. 2023; 60(8):1465-1482.

PMID: 37273496 PMC: 10230293. DOI: 10.1177/00420980211041018.


Enhancing Community Participation through Age-Friendly Ecosystems: A Rapid Realist Review.

Sixsmith J, Makita M, Menezes D, Cranwell M, Chau I, Smith M Geriatrics (Basel). 2023; 8(3).

PMID: 37218832 PMC: 10204480. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics8030052.


Shiver Me Tinders and Ring a Ding for a Fling-Sex Tech Use during COVID-19: Findings from a UK Study.

Marston H, Morgan D, Earle S, Hadley R Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 36981554 PMC: 10048256. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11060897.


References
1.
Burholt V, Windle G, Morgan D . A Social Model of Loneliness: The Roles of Disability, Social Resources, and Cognitive Impairment. Gerontologist. 2016; 57(6):1020-1030. PMC: 5881780. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnw125. View

2.
Ribeiro S, Dattilo W, Barbosa D, Coura-Vital W, Chagas I, Dias C . Worldwide COVID-19 spreading explained: traveling numbers as a primary driver for the pandemic. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2020; 92(4):e20201139. DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765202020201139. View

3.
Ribeiro S, Castro E Silva A, Dattilo W, Reis A, Goes-Neto A, Alcantara L . Severe airport sanitarian control could slow down the spreading of COVID-19 pandemics in Brazil. PeerJ. 2020; 8:e9446. PMC: 7321664. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9446. View

4.
Cotten S, Anderson W, McCullough B . Impact of internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(2):e39. PMC: 3636305. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2306. View

5.
Marston H, van Hoof J . "Who Doesn't Think about Technology When Designing Urban Environments for Older People?" A Case Study Approach to a Proposed Extension of the WHO's Age-Friendly Cities Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(19). PMC: 6801806. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193525. View