» Articles » PMID: 33178909

How Should We Use Imaging in the Determination of Brainstem Death?

Overview
Journal BJR Open
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Nov 12
PMID 33178909
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brainstem death is defined as the "irreversible cessation of brainstem function", either due to primary intracranial events or extracranial factors such as hypoxia. The importance of accurate and timely diagnosis of brainstem death in critical care should not be understated, as it allows the withdrawal of treatment when it is no longer deemed to beneficial. Additionally, it may facilitate the process of organ donation. Overall, the diagnosis of brainstem death has four common principles across the world: (1) neurological criteria based on clinical assessment; (2) evidence of irreversible brain damage from known aetiology; (3) demonstrating an absence of a reversible cause; and (4) the use of ancillary studies. The latter in particular has been a controversial issue, with much debate continuing on how imaging should be used. We discuss three key questions surrounding the role of imaging in the diagnosis of brainstem death as well as important issues the radiology community should consider.

Citing Articles

Ancillary tests for brain death.

Duvuru S, Sanker V, Mishra R, Sharma A, Lim S, Baskar N Front Neurol. 2025; 15():1491263.

PMID: 39839883 PMC: 11747481. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1491263.


The role of neuroimaging in the determination of brain death.

Correa D, Souza S, Nunes P, Coutinho Jr A, Hygino da Cruz Jr L Radiol Bras. 2022; 55(6):365-372.

PMID: 36514681 PMC: 9743262. DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2022.0016.


Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) in Selected Scenarios with Risk of Possible False-Positive or False-Negative Conclusions in Diagnosing Brain Death.

Schwarz G, Errath M, Arguelles Delgado P, Wiesspeiner U, Voit-Augustin H, Grims R Life (Basel). 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36294986 PMC: 9604663. DOI: 10.3390/life12101551.

References
1.
Chang J, Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos A, Malkoff M, Alexandrov A . Diagnostic Accuracy of Transcranial Doppler for Brain Death Confirmation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015; 37(3):408-14. PMC: 7960140. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4548. View

2.
Varelas P, Brady P, Rehman M, Afshinnik A, Mehta C, Abdelhak T . Primary Posterior Fossa Lesions and Preserved Supratentorial Cerebral Blood Flow: Implications for Brain Death Determination. Neurocrit Care. 2017; 27(3):407-414. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-017-0442-3. View

3.
Sawicki M, Solek-Pastuszka J, Chamier-Cieminska K, Walecka A, Bohatyrewicz R . Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Perfusion in Diagnosis of Brain Death: A Prospective Cohort Study. Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:2777-2785. PMC: 5957092. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.906304. View

4.
Kramer A, Roberts D . Computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of brain death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2014; 21(3):539-50. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-014-9997-4. View

5.
Shappell C, Frank J, Husari K, Sanchez M, Goldenberg F, Ardelt A . Practice variability in brain death determination: a call to action. Neurology. 2013; 81(23):2009-14. PMC: 3854834. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000436938.70528.4a. View