» Articles » PMID: 33178413

The Influence of Base Pair Tautomerism on Single Point Mutations in Aqueous DNA

Overview
Journal Interface Focus
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Nov 12
PMID 33178413
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The relationship between base pair hydrogen bond proton transfer and the rate of spontaneous single point mutations at ambient temperatures and pressures in aqueous DNA is investigated. By using an ensemble-based multiscale computational modelling method, statistically robust rates of proton transfer for the A:T and G:C base pairs within a solvated DNA dodecamer are calculated. Several different proton transfer pathways are observed within the same base pair. It is shown that, in G:C, the double proton transfer tautomer is preferred, while the single proton transfer process is favoured in A:T. The reported range of rate coefficients for double proton transfer is consistent with recent experimental data. Notwithstanding the approximately 1000 times more common presence of single proton transfer products from A:T, observationally there is bias towards G:C to A:T mutations in a wide range of living organisms. We infer that the double proton transfer reactions between G:C base pairs have a negligible contribution towards this bias for the following reasons: (i) the maximum half-life of the G*:C* tautomer is in the range of picoseconds, which is significantly smaller than the milliseconds it takes for DNA to unwind during replication, (ii) statistically, the majority of G*:C* tautomers revert back to their canonical forms through a barrierless process, and (iii) the thermodynamic instability of the tautomers with respect to the canonical base pairs. Through similar reasoning, we also deduce that proton transfer in the A:T base pair does not contribute to single point mutations in DNA.

Citing Articles

Electronic and Nuclear Quantum Effects on Proton Transfer Reactions of Guanine-Thymine (G-T) Mispairs Using Combined Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical and Machine Learning Potentials.

Tao Y, Giese T, York D Molecules. 2024; 29(11).

PMID: 38893576 PMC: 11173453. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29112703.


Multiscale simulations reveal the role of PcrA helicase in protecting against spontaneous point mutations in DNA.

Winokan M, Slocombe L, Al-Khalili J, Sacchi M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21749.

PMID: 38065963 PMC: 10709646. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48119-z.


Human DNA Mutations and their Impact on Genetic Disorders.

Samir S Recent Pat Biotechnol. 2023; 18(4):288-315.

PMID: 37936448 DOI: 10.2174/0118722083255081231020055309.


Investigating the Spectroscopy of the Gas Phase Guanine-Cytosine Pair: Keto versus Enol Configurations.

Botti G, Ceotto M, Conte R J Phys Chem Lett. 2023; 14(40):8940-8947.

PMID: 37768143 PMC: 10577776. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02073.


How proton transfer impacts hachimoji DNA.

Warman H, Slocombe L, Sacchi M RSC Adv. 2023; 13(20):13384-13396.

PMID: 37143915 PMC: 10152326. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra00983a.


References
1.
Fu L, Wang G, Ma B, Zhang H . Exploring the common molecular basis for the universal DNA mutation bias: revival of Löwdin mutation model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011; 409(3):367-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.05.017. View

2.
Haunschmidt M, Buchberger W, Klampfl C . Investigations on the migration behaviour of purines and pyrimidines in capillary electromigration techniques with UV detection and mass spectrometric detection. J Chromatogr A. 2008; 1213(1):88-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.09.063. View

3.
Nachman M, Crowell S . Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. Genetics. 2000; 156(1):297-304. PMC: 1461236. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.297. View

4.
Lee H, Popodi E, Tang H, Foster P . Rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in the bacterium Escherichia coli as determined by whole-genome sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(41):E2774-83. PMC: 3478608. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210309109. View

5.
Wang W, Hellinga H, Beese L . Structural evidence for the rare tautomer hypothesis of spontaneous mutagenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(43):17644-8. PMC: 3203791. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1114496108. View