» Articles » PMID: 33168856

Evaluating the Value of Day 0 of an ICSI Cycle on Indicating Laboratory Outcome

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Nov 10
PMID 33168856
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A number of oocyte characteristics have been associated with fertilization, implantation and live-birth rates, albeit without reaching a consensus. This study aims to delineate possible associations between oocyte characteristics, oocyte behavior during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), fertilization potential, and laboratory outcomes. Four-hundred and seventy-seven patients, yielding 3452 oocytes, were enrolled in this prospective observational study from 2015 to 2018. Οoplasm granularity was associated with poor embryo quality and higher probabilities of post-ICSI oocytes and embryos discarded in any developmental stage and never selected for embryo transfer or cryopreservation (p < 0.001). Both sudden or difficult ooplasm aspiration, and high or lack of resistance during ICSI were associated with either a poor Zygote-Score or fertilization failure (p < 0.001). Sudden or difficult ooplasm aspiration and high resistance during ICSI penetration were positively associated with resulting to a post-ICSI oocyte or embryo that would be selected for discard. Evaluation of oocyte characteristics and oocyte behavior during ICSI may provide early information regarding laboratory and cycle outcomes. Particularly, ooplasm granularity, and fragmentation of polar body, along with sudden or difficult ooplasm aspiration and high or lack of resistance during ICSI penetration may hinder the outcome of an ICSI cycle. The associations presented herein may contribute towards development of a grading system or a prediction model. Taking into account information on oocytes and ICSI behavior may effectively assist in enhancing IVF outcome rates.

Citing Articles

Molecular Drivers of Developmental Arrest in the Human Preimplantation Embryo: A Systematic Review and Critical Analysis Leading to Mapping Future Research.

Sfakianoudis K, Maziotis E, Karantzali E, Kokkini G, Grigoriadis S, Pantou A Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(15).

PMID: 34361119 PMC: 8347543. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22158353.

References
1.
Petersen B, Boel M, Montag M, Gardner D . Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(10):2231-44. PMC: 5027927. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew188. View

2.
Yu E, Ahn H, Lee J, Jee B, Kim S . Fertilization and embryo quality of mature oocytes with specific morphological abnormalities. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016; 42(4):156-62. PMC: 4724600. DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2015.42.4.156. View

3.
Pantou A, Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Giannelou P, Rapani A, Maziotis E . The Role of Laparoscopic Investigation in Enabling Natural Conception and Avoiding in vitro Fertilization Overuse for Infertile Patients of Unidentified Aetiology and Recurrent Implantation Failure Following in vitro Fertilization. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(4). PMC: 6517944. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8040548. View

4.
Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Antoniou N, Maziotis E, Rapani A, Bakas P . Making IVF more effective through the evolution of prediction models: is prognosis the missing piece of the puzzle?. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2018; 64(5):305-323. DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2018.1504347. View

5.
Ebner T, Maurer M, Shebl O, Moser M, Mayer R, Duba H . Planar embryos have poor prognosis in terms of blastocyst formation and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012; 25(3):267-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.05.007. View