» Articles » PMID: 33168107

Female Sex and Femininity Independently Associate with Common Somatic Symptom Trajectories

Overview
Journal Psychol Med
Specialty Psychology
Date 2020 Nov 10
PMID 33168107
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Multiple predictors have been associated with persistent somatic symptoms. However, previous studies problematically defined the persistence of symptoms, conflated participants' sex and gender, and focused on patient populations. Therefore, we studied associations between predictors, especially sex and gender, and longitudinal patterns of somatic symptoms in the general adult population. We also assessed whether predictors for persisting symptoms differ between sexes.

Method: To identify developmental trajectories of somatic symptoms, assessed by the SCL-90 SOM, we used latent class trajectory modeling in the Dutch Lifelines Cohort Study [ = 150 494; 58.6% female; median time to follow-up: 46.0 (min-max: 22.0-123.0) months]. To identify predictors of trajectories, we applied multiple logistic regression analyses. Predictors were measured by surveys at baseline and a composite gender index was previously developed.

Results: A five-class linear LCGA model fitted the data best: 93.7% of the population had a stable symptom trajectory, whereas 1.5% and 4.8% of the population had a consistently increasing or decreasing symptom trajectory, respectively. Female sex predicted severe, stable symptom severity (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.36-2.22), but not increasing symptom severity (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.99-1.40). Femininity was protective hereof (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.82 and OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.85, respectively). Merely a few predictors of symptom severity, for instance hours of paid employment and physical functioning, differed in strength between sexes. Yet, effect sizes were small.

Conclusion: Female sex and femininity predict symptom trajectories. No large sex differences in the strength of additional predictors were found, thus it may not be clinically useful to distinguish between predictors specific to male or female patients of persistent somatic symptoms.

Citing Articles

Discordance between Adolescents and Parents in Functional Somatic Symptom Reports: Sex Differences and Future Symptom Prevalence.

Hogendoorn E, Ballering A, van Dijk M, Rosmalen J, Burke S J Youth Adolesc. 2023; 52(10):2182-2195.

PMID: 37354312 PMC: 10371884. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-023-01810-w.


Sex and gender differences in primary care help-seeking for common somatic symptoms: a longitudinal study.

Ballering A, Olde Hartman T, Verheij R, Rosmalen J Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023; 41(2):132-139.

PMID: 36995265 PMC: 10193899. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2191653.


Persistence of somatic symptoms after COVID-19 in the Netherlands: an observational cohort study.

Ballering A, van Zon S, Olde Hartman T, Rosmalen J Lancet. 2022; 400(10350):452-461.

PMID: 35934007 PMC: 9352274. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01214-4.

References
1.
De Gucht V, Fischler B, Heiser W . Personality and affect as determinants of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care; A follow-up study. J Psychosom Res. 2004; 56(3):279-85. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00127-2. View

2.
Castro Y, Carbonell J, Anestis J . The influence of gender role on the prediction of antisocial behaviour and somatization. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011; 58(4):409-16. DOI: 10.1177/0020764011406807. View

3.
Lennon H, Kelly S, Sperrin M, Buchan I, Cross A, Leitzmann M . Framework to construct and interpret latent class trajectory modelling. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(7):e020683. PMC: 6042544. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020683. View

4.
Loikas D, Karlsson L, von Euler M, Hallgren K, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Bastholm Rahmner P . Does patient's sex influence treatment in primary care? Experiences and expressed knowledge among physicians--a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015; 16:137. PMC: 4603906. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0351-5. View

5.
Zijlema W, Stolk R, Lowe B, Rief W, White P, Rosmalen J . How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires. J Psychosom Res. 2013; 74(6):459-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.093. View