» Articles » PMID: 33168003

Factors Impacting the Implementation of a Psychoeducation Intervention Within the Mental Health System: a Multisite Study Using the Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Nov 10
PMID 33168003
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite a strong evidence base and policy recommendation supporting the implementation of psychoeducation interventions within the mental health system, equitable access for many service users and family members has not been achieved. To enhance translation, developing an evidence-base around the factors that influence implementation of interventions is critical.

Methods: The aim of the study was to explore the factors influencing implementation of a group cofacilitated recovery focused psychoeducation intervention. The study design was explorative qualitative descriptive, involving the collection of data through individual and focus group interviews with key stakeholders (n = 75) involved with the implementation within 14 mental health sites in the Republic of Ireland. The Consolidation Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as a conceptual framework to guide data collection and analysis.

Results: Key enablers and barriers were identified across all CFIR domains of the framework with some factors (depending on context) being both an enabler and a barrier. Important factors in the outer setting domain included structural stability within national systems and the peer payment system, while the extent of a recovery-oriented culture, leadership, implementation readiness, and buy-in were influential factors in the inner setting. The characteristics of the intervention in terms of design, evidence-base and adaptability also shaped the intervention's implementation as did the knowledge, beliefs and self-efficacy of facilitators. In terms of processes, implementation was influenced by the degree of engagement of key individuals who championed and supported the programme. The results highlight that while some of the barriers were specific to the programme, many reflected systemic and structural challenges within health services more generally.

Conclusion: Findings from this study provide an enhanced understanding of the different layers of determinants to implementation of an intervention. Overcoming challenges will involve positive and ongoing engagement and collaboration across the full range of stakeholders that are active within each domain, including policy and operational levels. The quality of leadership at each domain level is of crucial importance to successful implementation.

Citing Articles

Behavioural interventions targeting the prevention and treatment of young children's mental health problems in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Kassa G, Yu Z, Minwuyelet F, Gross D J Glob Health. 2025; 15():04018.

PMID: 39849969 PMC: 11758180. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.15.04018.


The Helping Hand in Ukraine: feasibility and potential impact.

Raknes S, Chorna T Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024; 10(1):96.

PMID: 38951948 PMC: 11218384. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-024-01520-5.


Psychoeducational interventions for people living with chronic communicable disease: a systematic review.

Burke A, Davoren M, Arensman E, Harrington J BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3):e077007.

PMID: 38521523 PMC: 10961541. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077007.


Evidence-based psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia: a critical review.

Barlati S, Nibbio G, Vita A Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2024; 37(3):131-139.

PMID: 38410981 PMC: 10990032. DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000925.


Perspectives of key informants before and after implementing UPSIDES peer support in mental health services: qualitative findings from an international multi-site study.

Haun M, Ben-Dor I, Hall C, Kalha J, Korde P, Moran G BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):159.

PMID: 38302955 PMC: 10835950. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10543-w.


References
1.
Jewell T, Downing D, McFarlane W . Partnering with families: multiple family group psychoeducation for schizophrenia. J Clin Psychol. 2009; 65(8):868-78. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20610. View

2.
Brady P, Kangas M, McGill K . "Family Matters": A Systematic Review of the Evidence For Family Psychoeducation For Major Depressive Disorder. J Marital Fam Ther. 2016; 43(2):245-263. DOI: 10.1111/jmft.12204. View

3.
Higgins A, Hevey D, Boyd F, Cusack N, Downes C, Monahan M . Outcomes of a co-facilitation skills training programme for mental health service users, family members, and clinicians: the EOLAS project. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017; 27(2):911-921. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12388. View

4.
Colom F, Vieta E, Sanchez-Moreno J, Goikolea J, Popova E, Bonnin C . Psychoeducation for bipolar II disorder: an exploratory, 5-year outcome subanalysis. J Affect Disord. 2008; 112(1-3):30-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.023. View

5.
Eassom E, Giacco D, Dirik A, Priebe S . Implementing family involvement in the treatment of patients with psychosis: a systematic review of facilitating and hindering factors. BMJ Open. 2014; 4(10):e006108. PMC: 4187461. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006108. View