» Articles » PMID: 33166568

Juvenile Stress Facilitates Safety Learning in Male and Female High Alcohol Preferring Mice

Overview
Journal Behav Brain Res
Date 2020 Nov 9
PMID 33166568
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adversities during juvenility increase the risk for stress-related disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder. However, stress can also induce coping mechanisms beneficial for later stressful experiences. We reported previously that mice selectively bred for high alcohol preference (HAP) exposed to stress during adolescence (but not during adulthood) showed enhanced fear-conditioned responses in adulthood, as measured by fear-potentiated startle (FPS). However, HAP mice also showed enhanced responding to safety cues predicting the absence of foot shocks in adulthood. Here, we pursue these findings in HAP mice by investigating in further detail how juvenile stress impacts the acquisition of safety and fear learning. HAP mice were subjected to three days of juvenile stress (postnatal days 25, 27, 28) and discriminative safety/fear conditioning in adulthood. FPS was used to assess safety versus fear cue discrimination, fear learning, and fear inhibition by the safety cue. Both stressed and unstressed HAP mice were able to discriminate between both cues as well as learn the fear cue-shock association. Interestingly, it was only the previously stressed mice that were able to inhibit their fear response when the fear cue was co-presented with the safety cue, thus demonstrating safety learning. We also report an incidental finding of alopecia in the juvenile stress groups, a phenotype seen in stress-related disorders. These results in HAP mice may be relevant to understanding the influence of juvenile trauma for individual risk and resilience toward developing PTSD and how individuals might benefit from safety cues in behavioral psychotherapy.

Citing Articles

Translational approaches to the neurobiological study of conditional discrimination and inhibition: Implications for psychiatric disease.

Sangha S, Fitzgerald J Behav Neurosci. 2024; 138(4):244-259.

PMID: 38913706 PMC: 11574918. DOI: 10.1037/bne0000594.


Line- and sex-dependent effects of juvenile stress on contextual fear- and anxiety-related behavior in high- and low-alcohol-preferring mouse lines.

Mukadam A, Chester J Behav Brain Res. 2024; 463:114899.

PMID: 38342379 PMC: 10954351. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.114899.


Environmental certainty influences the neural systems regulating responses to threat and stress.

Meyer H, Sangha S, Radley J, LaLumiere R, Baratta M Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021; 131:1037-1055.

PMID: 34673111 PMC: 8642312. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.014.

References
1.
Sangha S, Chadick J, Janak P . Safety encoding in the basal amygdala. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(9):3744-51. PMC: 6619315. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3302-12.2013. View

2.
Pollak D, Monje F, Lubec G . The learned safety paradigm as a mouse model for neuropsychiatric research. Nat Protoc. 2010; 5(5):954-62. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2010.64. View

3.
Chester J, Barrenha G . Acoustic startle at baseline and during acute alcohol withdrawal in replicate mouse lines selectively bred for high or low alcohol preference. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007; 31(10):1633-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00462.x. View

4.
Romeo R, Kaplowitz E, Ho A, Franco D . The influence of puberty on stress reactivity and forebrain glucocorticoid receptor levels in inbred and outbred strains of male and female mice. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012; 38(4):592-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.07.019. View

5.
Day H, Reed M, Stevenson C . Sex differences in discriminating between cues predicting threat and safety. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016; 133:196-203. PMC: 4993817. DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.07.014. View