» Articles » PMID: 33162706

Comparison of the Accuracy of Capillary Hemoglobin Estimation and Venous Hemoglobin Estimation by Two Models of HemoCue Against Automated Cell Counter Hemoglobin Measurement

Overview
Specialty Hematology
Date 2020 Nov 9
PMID 33162706
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: HemoCue point of care devices has been extensively used in screening for anemia in blood banking. HemoCue can estimate hemoglobin (Hb) both from venous as well as capillary blood. However, the suitability of HemoCue Hb estimation in donor selection is unclear.

Aims: The aims of this study were to evaluate variance of difference in Hb measurement in capillary HemoCue estimation as compared to venous HemoCue estimation from automated cell counter and to assess accuracy of two different HemoCue models (201 and 301) against automated cell counter Hb measurements in both capillary as well as venous blood.

Materials And Methods: HemoCue 201 and 301 were evaluated by a comparison of methods study against Sysmex XP-100 three-part analyzer at a blood bank of a tertiary care hospital in Uttarakhand, India, in 2017. Assessment for anemia of 115 donors was done initially by capillary Hb by a convenience sampling to 2 instruments from 2 different models of HemoCue (total of 4 instruments). Venous blood collected was analyzed by Sysmex XP-100 and all HemoCue analyzers.

Results: For capillary method, bias ranged from -0.97 to -0.37 g/dL, upper limit of agreement (LOA) ranged from 0.72 to -1.06 g/dL, and lower LOA ranged from -2.65 to -1.79 g/dL. For venous method, bias ranged from -0.03 to -0.24 g/dL, the upper LOA ranged from 0.81 to -1.07 g/dL, and lower LOA ranged from -1.04 to -0.57 g/dL. Thus, capillary HemoCue estimation exhibited greater bias as well as wider LOA. Variance of the differences from automated counter was significantly lower for venous HemoCue comparison compared to capillary HemoCue estimation ( < 0.001 for each instrument).

Conclusion: Errors in capillary sampling of blood show the extent to which preanalytical errors can influence results in point-of-care devices. We suggest augmentation of any blood bank-based Hb screening process based just on capillary sampling to be augmented by a properly selected venous sampling to reduce deferral for a false-positive screen of anemia.

Citing Articles

Comparing HemoCue® and Quantitative Buffy Coat® and Coulter Counter-measured haemoglobin concentrations in African children with acute uncomplicated malaria: a Bland-Altman analysis.

Ayuen D, Olupot-Olupot P, Muhindo R, Onyamboko M, Ajayi S, Chimjinda N Malar J. 2025; 24(1):77.

PMID: 40069748 PMC: 11895147. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-025-05318-5.


Comparison of haemoglobin concentration measurements using HemoCue-301 and Sysmex XN-Series 1500: A survey among anaemic Gambian infants aged 6-12 months.

Bah M, Verhoef H, Camara A, Ngom M, Jallow D, Bajo K PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0310577.

PMID: 39585858 PMC: 11588255. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310577.


Noninvasive hemoglobin quantification across different cohorts using a wearable diffuse reflectance spectroscopy system.

Chen Y, Lai G, Chen C, Cheng H, Tseng S Biomed Opt Express. 2024; 15(3):1739-1749.

PMID: 38495710 PMC: 10942696. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.517645.


Use of point-of-care haemoglobin tests to diagnose childhood anaemia in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

Brehm R, South A, George E Trop Med Int Health. 2023; 29(2):73-87.

PMID: 38044262 PMC: 7615606. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13957.


Comparison of Anemia Screening Methods Using Paired Venous Samples in Women of Reproductive Age in Southern India.

Fothergill A, Crider K, Johnson C, Raj M, Guetterman H, Bose B J Nutr. 2022; 152(12):2978-2992.

PMID: 36130238 PMC: 9840000. DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxac218.


References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Munoz M, Romero A, Gomez J, Manteca A, Naveira E, Ramirez G . Utility of point-of-care haemoglobin measurement in the HemoCue-B haemoglobin for the initial diagnosis of anaemia. Clin Lab Haematol. 2005; 27(2):99-104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.2005.00678.x. View

3.
Sanchis-Gomar F, Cortell-Ballester J, Pareja-Galeano H, Banfi G, Lippi G . Hemoglobin point-of-care testing: the HemoCue system. J Lab Autom. 2012; 18(3):198-205. DOI: 10.1177/2211068212457560. View

4.
. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2015; 81(3):14-8. View

5.
Gomez-Simon A, Navarro-Nunez L, Perez-Ceballos E, Lozano M, Candela M, Cascales A . Evaluation of four rapid methods for hemoglobin screening of whole blood donors in mobile collection settings. Transfus Apher Sci. 2007; 36(3):235-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2007.01.010. View