» Articles » PMID: 33162642

Exploring Mechanisms of Recruitment and Recruitment Cooperation in Respondent Driven Sampling

Overview
Journal J Off Stat
Date 2020 Nov 9
PMID 33162642
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Respondent driven sampling (RDS) is a sampling method designed for hard-to-sample groups with strong social ties. RDS starts with a small number of arbitrarily selected participants (""). Seeds are issued recruitment coupons, which are used to recruit from their social networks. Waves of recruitment and data collection continue until reaching a sufficient sample size. Under the assumptions of random recruitment, with-replacement sampling, and a sufficient number of waves, the probability of selection for each participant converges to be proportional to their network size. With recruitment noncooperation, however, recruitment can end abruptly, causing operational difficulties with unstable sample sizes. Noncooperation may void the recruitment Markovian assumptions, leading to selection bias. Here, we consider two RDS studies: one targeting Korean immigrants in Los Angeles and in Michigan; and another study targeting persons who inject drugs in Southeast Michigan. We explore predictors of coupon redemption, associations between recruiter and recruits, and details within recruitment dynamics. While no consistent predictors of noncooperation were found, there was evidence that coupon redemption of targeted recruits was more common among those who shared social bonds with their recruiters, suggesting that noncooperation is more likely to be a feature of recruits not cooperating, rather than recruiters failing to distribute coupons.

Citing Articles

Challenges of virtual RDS for recruitment of sexual minority women for a behavioral health study.

Middleton D, Drabble L, Krug D, Karriker-Jaffe K, Mericle A, Hughes T J Surv Stat Methodol. 2024; 10(2):466-488.

PMID: 38737967 PMC: 11086662. DOI: 10.1093/jssam/smab039.


Employing Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) to recruit people who inject drugs (PWID) and other hard-to-reach populations during COVID-19: Lessons learned.

Abadie R, Habecker P, Carrasco K, Chiou K, Fernando S, Bennett S Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:990055.

PMID: 36262631 PMC: 9574048. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.990055.

References
1.
Selvaraj V, Boopathi K, Paranjape R, Mehendale S . A single weighting approach to analyze respondent-driven sampling data. Indian J Med Res. 2017; 144(3):447-459. PMC: 5320851. DOI: 10.4103/0971-5916.198665. View

2.
Kalsbeek W . Sampling minority groups in health surveys. Stat Med. 2003; 22(9):1527-49. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1510. View

3.
Li J, Valente T, Shin H, Weeks M, Zelenev A, Moothi G . Overlooked Threats to Respondent Driven Sampling Estimators: Peer Recruitment Reality, Degree Measures, and Random Selection Assumption. AIDS Behav. 2017; 22(7):2340-2359. PMC: 5745307. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-017-1827-1. View

4.
McCreesh N, Copas A, Seeley J, Johnston L, Sonnenberg P, Hayes R . Respondent driven sampling: determinants of recruitment and a method to improve point estimation. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e78402. PMC: 3814964. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078402. View

5.
Gile K, Handcock M . Network Model-Assisted Inference from Respondent-Driven Sampling Data. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2015; 178(3):619-639. PMC: 4669074. DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12091. View