» Articles » PMID: 33162196

Comparing Loneliness in England and the United States, 2014-2016: Differential Item Functioning and Risk Factor Prevalence and Impact

Overview
Journal Soc Sci Med
Date 2020 Nov 9
PMID 33162196
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare mean levels of loneliness, and correlates of loneliness, among older adults in the U.S. and England. Comparisons are conducted after attending to comparability of the loneliness measure between countries based on tests for discriminatory capacity and differential item functioning of the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale. Cross-sectional data from the 2015-16 wave of the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP) and the 2014-2015 wave of the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing (ELSA) were analyzed using graded item response models and multiple indicators and multiple causes (MIMIC) models. Risk factors included demographic variables, health characteristics, and social characteristics that were harmonized across surveys. Because of differences in the racial-ethnic composition of the U.S. and England, analyses were limited to white respondents (N = 2624 in NSHAP; N = 6639 in ELSA). Only respondents born 1925-1965 were included in analyses. Discriminatory capacity was evident in each item being able to distinguish a lonely from a nonlonely individual. Differential item functioning (DIF) was evident in country differences in the likelihood of endorsing the "lack companionship" item at a given level of trait loneliness, and in DIF among marital status, education, and gender subgroups that were comparable across countries. Overall loneliness levels are equivalent in England and the U.S. Risk factor impact did not differ between countries, but differences in risk factor prevalence between countries combined to produce a net result of slightly lower mean levels of loneliness in older adults in England than in the U.S. after risk factor adjustment. The fact that the impact of risk factors were similar across countries suggests that evidence of successful interventions in one country could be leveraged to accelerate development of effective interventions in the other.

Citing Articles

Psychosocial Well-Being Differences Between the Young Old, Old-Old, and Oldest Old: A Global Comparison.

Burns S, Crimmins E, Zhang M, Ailshire J J Aging Health. 2024; 8982643241264587.

PMID: 39031083 PMC: 11743824. DOI: 10.1177/08982643241264587.


Feeling Alone Together: Loneliness in Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment and Their Family Caregivers with Low Mastery.

Sung P, Chan A, Lim-Soh J Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2024; 53(2):66-73.

PMID: 38354725 PMC: 11098021. DOI: 10.1159/000536644.


The Indirect Impact of Educational Attainment as a Distal Resource for Older Adults on Loneliness, Social Isolation, Psychological Resilience, and Technology Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study.

Balki E, Hayes N, Holland C JMIR Aging. 2023; 6:e47729.

PMID: 37999938 PMC: 10709794. DOI: 10.2196/47729.


Loneliness and older adults: psychological resilience and technology use during the COVID-19 pandemic-a cross sectional study.

Balki E, Hayes N, Holland C Front Aging. 2023; 4:1184386.

PMID: 37434741 PMC: 10331608. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2023.1184386.


Remote Communication and Loneliness During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study.

Arakawa Y, Inoue K, Nishioka D, Nakagomi A, Tabuchi T, Kondo N J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45338.

PMID: 37432730 PMC: 10369164. DOI: 10.2196/45338.


References
1.
Hughes M, Waite L, Hawkley L, Cacioppo J . A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res Aging. 2008; 26(6):655-672. PMC: 2394670. DOI: 10.1177/0164027504268574. View

2.
Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J . Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(15):5797-801. PMC: 3625264. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1219686110. View

3.
Katz S, Ford A, Moskowitz R, Jackson B, JAFFE M . STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963; 185:914-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. View

4.
Hawkley L, Kocherginsky M . Transitions in Loneliness Among Older Adults: A 5-Year Follow-Up in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. Res Aging. 2018; 40(4):365-387. PMC: 6355458. DOI: 10.1177/0164027517698965. View

5.
Payne C, Hedberg E, Kozloski M, Dale W, McClintock M . Using and interpreting mental health measures in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014; 69 Suppl 2:S99-116. PMC: 4303090. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbu100. View