» Articles » PMID: 33158900

Analysis of Campylobacter Jejuni Subtype Distribution in the Chicken Broiler Production Continuum: a Longitudinal Examination To Identify Primary Contamination Points

Overview
Date 2020 Nov 7
PMID 33158900
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Significant knowledge gaps exist in our understanding of contamination of the poultry production continuum. Microbiological surveillance and genotypic characterization were undertaken on isolates longitudinally recovered from three poultry farms (weekly samples), the abattoir at which birds were processed, and at retail over a 542-day period in southwestern Alberta, Canada, as a model location. Subtypes were compared to concurrent isolates from diarrheic humans living in the study region. Barn outbreaks in broiler chickens occurred infrequently. Subtypes from colonized birds, including clinically relevant subtypes of , were recovered within barns and from subsequent production stages. When was detected in barns, most birds rapidly became colonized by a limited number of subtypes late in the cycle. However, the diversity of subtypes recovered from birds in the abattoir increased substantially. Moreover, birds deemed free of upon exit from the barn became contaminated within the abattoir environment, and a high prevalence of meat at retail was contaminated with , including subtypes that had not been previously observed in the barns. The observed increase in prevalence of contamination and diversity of subtypes along the chicken production continuum indicates that birds from a relatively small number of barns contaminate transport trucks and the abattoir with strains, which are collectively transferred to poultry within the abattoir and conveyed to and persist on retail products. We conclude that the abattoir was the primary contamination point of poultry by but only a subset of subtypes were a high risk to human beings. The longitudinal examination of subtypes throughout the broiler production continuum is required to determine transmission mechanisms and to identify potential reservoirs and the foodborne risk posed. We showed that a limited number of subtypes are responsible for infrequent outbreaks in broilers within production barns and that colonized birds from a small number of farms are introduced into the abattoir where a high prevalence of carcasses are subsequently contaminated with a diversity of subtypes, which are transferred onto poultry in retail settings. However, only a subset of strains on poultry was determined to be clinically relevant. The study findings showed that resolving at the subtype level is important to ascertain health risks, and the knowledge obtained in the study provides information to mitigate clinically relevant subtypes to reduce the burden of campylobacteriosis.

Citing Articles

Source attribution of human infection: a multi-country model in the European Union.

Thystrup C, Brinch M, Henri C, Mughini-Gras L, Franz E, Wieczorek K Front Microbiol. 2025; 16:1519189.

PMID: 39973931 PMC: 11835883. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1519189.


High diversity in retail chicken: epidemiologically important strains may be missed with current sampling methods.

Dziegiel A, Bloomfield S, Savva G, Palau R, Janecko N, Wain J Epidemiol Infect. 2024; 152():e101.

PMID: 39168635 PMC: 11736455. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268824000906.


Molecular Epidemiological Evidence Implicates Cattle as a Primary Reservoir of Infecting People via Contaminated Chickens.

Teixeira J, Boras V, Hetman B, Taboada E, Inglis G Pathogens. 2022; 11(11).

PMID: 36422616 PMC: 9698452. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11111366.


Genomic Characterisation of Isolates Recovered During Commercial Broiler Production.

Truccollo B, Whyte P, Burgess C, Bolton D Front Microbiol. 2021; 12:716182.

PMID: 34721320 PMC: 8552067. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.716182.


Expeller-Pressed Canola () Meal Modulates the Structure and Function of the Cecal Microbiota, and Alters the Metabolome of the Pancreas, Liver, and Breast Muscle of Broiler Chickens.

Inglis G, Wright B, Sheppard S, Abbott D, Oryschak M, Montina T Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(2).

PMID: 33672178 PMC: 7926547. DOI: 10.3390/ani11020577.

References
1.
Jacobs-Reitsma W, van de Giessen A, Bolder N, Mulder R . Epidemiology of Campylobacter spp. at two Dutch broiler farms. Epidemiol Infect. 1995; 114(3):413-21. PMC: 2271305. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800052122. View

2.
Berndtson E, Danielsson-Tham M, Engvall A . Campylobacter incidence on a chicken farm and the spread of Campylobacter during the slaughter process. Int J Food Microbiol. 1996; 32(1-2):35-47. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1605(96)01102-6. View

3.
Taboada E, Clark C, Sproston E, Carrillo C . Current methods for molecular typing of Campylobacter species. J Microbiol Methods. 2013; 95(1):24-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.07.007. View

4.
Seliwiorstow T, Bare J, Berkvens D, Van Damme I, Uyttendaele M, De Zutter L . Identification of risk factors for Campylobacter contamination levels on broiler carcasses during the slaughter process. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016; 226:26-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.03.010. View

5.
Hutcheson K . A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula. J Theor Biol. 1970; 29(1):151-4. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(70)90124-4. View