» Articles » PMID: 33157110

Does Greenery Experienced Indoors and Outdoors Provide an Escape and Support Mental Health During the COVID-19 Quarantine?

Overview
Journal Environ Res
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2020 Nov 6
PMID 33157110
Citations 63
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly changed people's ability to recreate in public green spaces, which is likely to exacerbate the psychological impacts of the pandemic. In the current study, we seek to understand whether greenery can support mental health even with insufficient outdoor exposure in times of physical isolation from the outdoor environment.

Methods: Between 17 May and 10 June, 2020, we conducted an online survey among 323 students (21.99 ± 3.10 years; 31% male) in health-related programs from two universities in the city of Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Severities of depressive and anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks were measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. We employed two self-reported measures of greenery experienced indoors (number of houseplants in the home and proportion of exterior greenery visible from inside the home) and two measures of greenery experienced outdoors (presence/absence of a domestic garden and availability of neighborhood greenery). Restorative quality of the home (the "being away" dimension of the Perceived Restorativeness Scale; PRS) and the neighborhood (the "being away" and "fascination" dimensions of the PRS), engagement with outdoor greenery (frequency of different types of interaction) and perceived social support were treated as mediators. Associations between greenery and mental health were tested using generalized linear regression and logistic regression. Structural equation modelling (SEM) techniques were used to test the theoretically-indicated relations among the variables.

Results: Clinically-meaningful symptoms of moderate depression and anxiety were reported by approximately 33% and 20% of the students, respectively. The relative abundance of greenery visible from the home or in the neighborhood was associated with reduced depressive/anxiety symptoms and lower depression/anxiety rates. Having more houseplants or a garden was also associated with some of these markers of mental health. As hypothesized, the mental health-supportive effects of indoor greenery were largely explained by increased feelings of being away while at home. Neighborhood greenery contributed to neighborhood restorative quality, which in turn facilitated social support and more frequent engagement with greenery, and that led to better mental health.

Conclusions: Students who spent most of their time at home during the COVID-19 epidemic experienced better mental health when exposed to more greenery. Our findings support the idea that exposure to greenery may be a valuable resource during social isolation in the home. However, causal interpretation of these associations is not straightforward.

Citing Articles

Impact of natural views on mental health during COVID-19 quarantine: A natural experiment.

Yen M, Li D, Weng P, Chiang Y J Environ Psychol. 2025; 100.

PMID: 40062008 PMC: 11883897. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102455.


Assessing the restorative effects of campus greeness on student depression: a comparative study across three distinct university campus type in Macau.

Liu H, Wang Y, He Q, Wang X, Cui C, Gong Y BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):907.

PMID: 40050861 PMC: 11887352. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21356-9.


Association between residential greenness and severe psychological distress and the moderating role of 'stay-at-home' status: a population-based cross-sectional study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.

Nishimura H, Nawa N, Yamaoka Y, Koyama Y, Kuramochi J, Fujiwara T BMJ Public Health. 2025; 1(1):e000093.

PMID: 40017877 PMC: 11812707. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000093.


Public perception vs ecological quality status: Examining the ecological restoration of the Congost River's Environment.

Zaldo-Aubanell Q, Mas-Ponce A, Asbert G, Clota B, Isnard M, Proia L Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34615.

PMID: 39130423 PMC: 11315083. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34615.


Effects of different natural soundscapes on human psychophysiology in national forest park.

Bai Z, Zhang S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17462.

PMID: 39075109 PMC: 11286786. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67812-1.


References
1.
Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Lowe B . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(10):1092-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. View

2.
Keller A, Leikauf J, Holt-Gosselin B, Staveland B, Williams L . Paying attention to attention in depression. Transl Psychiatry. 2019; 9(1):279. PMC: 6838308. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-019-0616-1. View

3.
Callaghan A, McCombe G, Harrold A, McMeel C, Mills G, Moore-Cherry N . The impact of green spaces on mental health in urban settings: a scoping review. J Ment Health. 2020; 30(2):179-193. DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1755027. View

4.
Howarth M, Brettle A, Hardman M, Maden M . What is the evidence for the impact of gardens and gardening on health and well-being: a scoping review and evidence-based logic model to guide healthcare strategy decision making on the use of gardening approaches as a social prescription. BMJ Open. 2020; 10(7):e036923. PMC: 7371129. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036923. View

5.
Annerstedt M, Wahrborg P . Nature-assisted therapy: systematic review of controlled and observational studies. Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39(4):371-88. DOI: 10.1177/1403494810396400. View