» Articles » PMID: 33157007

An RCT of Rapid Genomic Sequencing Among Seriously Ill Infants Results in High Clinical Utility, Changes in Management, and Low Perceived Harm

Abstract

The second Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health (NSIGHT2) study was a randomized, controlled trial of rapid whole-genome sequencing (rWGS) or rapid whole-exome sequencing (rWES) in infants with diseases of unknown etiology in intensive care units (ICUs). Gravely ill infants were not randomized and received ultra-rapid whole-genome sequencing (urWGS). Herein we report results of clinician surveys of the clinical utility of rapid genomic sequencing (RGS). The primary end-point-clinician perception that RGS was useful- was met for 154 (77%) of 201 infants. Both positive and negative tests were rated as having clinical utility (42 of 45 [93%] and 112 of 156 [72%], respectively). Physicians reported that RGS changed clinical management in 57 (28%) infants, particularly in those receiving urWGS (p = 0.0001) and positive tests (p < 0.00001). Outcomes of 32 (15%) infants were perceived to be changed by RGS. Positive tests changed outcomes more frequently than negative tests (p < 0.00001). In logistic regression models, the likelihood that RGS was perceived as useful increased 6.7-fold when associated with changes in management (95% CI 1.8-43.3). Changes in management were 10.1-fold more likely when results were positive (95% CI 4.7-22.4) and turnaround time was shorter (odds ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99). RGS seldom led to clinician-perceived confusion or distress among families (6 of 207 [3%]). In summary, clinicians perceived high clinical utility and low likelihood of harm with first-tier RGS of infants in ICUs with diseases of unknown etiology. RGS was perceived as beneficial irrespective of whether results were positive or negative.

Citing Articles

A machine learning decision support tool optimizes WGS utilization in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Juarez E, Peterson B, Kobayashi E, Gilmer S, Tobin L, Schultz B NPJ Digit Med. 2025; 8(1):72.

PMID: 39885315 PMC: 11782664. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01458-9.


Exome and Genome Sequencing to Diagnose the Genetic Basis of Neonatal Hypotonia: An International Consortium Study.

Morton S, Costain G, French C, Wakeling E, Szuto A, Christodoulou J Neurology. 2024; 104(1):e210106.

PMID: 39700446 PMC: 11666248. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210106.


Genome-based newborn screening for severe childhood genetic diseases has high positive predictive value and sensitivity in a NICU pilot trial.

Kingsmore S, Wright M, Olsen L, Schultz B, Protopsaltis L, Averbuj D Am J Hum Genet. 2024; 111(12):2643-2667.

PMID: 39642868 PMC: 11639094. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.020.


Clinical utility of rapid whole genome sequencing in neonatal patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Amin M, Wigby K, Suttner D, Niemi A, Guidugli L, Carroll J J Perinatol. 2024; .

PMID: 39604575 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-024-02181-1.


Multidimensional and Longitudinal Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for Critically Ill Infants.

Wojcik M, Del Rosario M, Feldman H, Smith H, Holm I Pediatrics. 2024; 154(6).

PMID: 39512073 PMC: 11614160. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-068197.


References
1.
Harrison W, Goodman D . Epidemiologic Trends in Neonatal Intensive Care, 2007-2012. JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169(9):855-62. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1305. View

2.
Willig L, Petrikin J, Smith L, Saunders C, Thiffault I, Miller N . Whole-genome sequencing for identification of Mendelian disorders in critically ill infants: a retrospective analysis of diagnostic and clinical findings. Lancet Respir Med. 2015; 3(5):377-87. PMC: 4479194. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00139-3. View

3.
Berg J, Agrawal P, Bailey Jr D, Beggs A, Brenner S, Brower A . Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health. Pediatrics. 2017; 139(2). PMC: 5260149. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-2252. View

4.
Stark Z, Schofield D, Martyn M, Rynehart L, Shrestha R, Alam K . Does genomic sequencing early in the diagnostic trajectory make a difference? A follow-up study of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Genet Med. 2018; 21(1):173-180. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0006-8. View

5.
Grosse S, Farnaes L . Genomic sequencing in acutely ill infants: what will it take to demonstrate clinical value?. Genet Med. 2018; 21(2):269-271. PMC: 6691721. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0124-3. View