» Articles » PMID: 33155180

Anticoagulation Favors Thrombus Recanalization and Survival in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis and Portal Vein Thrombosis: Results of a Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Adv Ther
Date 2020 Nov 6
PMID 33155180
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Benefit and risk of anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT) remain controversial, especially in those with asymptomatic PVT and in non-liver transplant candidates. Furthermore, the predictors of portal vein recanalization and bleeding events after anticoagulation are critical for making clinical decisions, but still unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the outcomes of anticoagulation for PVT in liver cirrhosis and explore the predictors of portal vein recanalization and bleeding events after anticoagulation.

Methods: All studies regarding anticoagulation for PVT in liver cirrhosis were searched via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Thrombotic outcomes, bleeding events, and survival were compared between anticoagulation and non-anticoagulation groups. Predictors of portal vein recanalization and bleeding events were pooled. Risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results: Thirty-three studies including 1696 cirrhotic patients with PVT were included. Anticoagulation significantly increased portal vein recanalization (RR = 2.61; 95% CI 1.99-3.43; P < 0.00001) and overall survival (RR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.21; P = 0.01) and decreased thrombus progression (RR = 0.26; 95% CI 0.14-0.49; P < 0.0001). Anticoagulation did not significantly influence overall bleeding (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.47-1.30; P = 0.34). Early initiation of anticoagulation (RR = 1.58; 95% CI 1.21-2.07; P = 0.0007) significantly increased portal vein recanalization. Child-Pugh class B and C (RR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.62-0.95; P = 0.02) and higher MELD score (MD = - 1.48; 95% CI - 2.20-0.76; P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with decreased portal vein recanalization. No predictor significantly associated with bleeding events was identified.

Conclusions: Early initiation of anticoagulation should be supported in liver cirrhosis with PVT. Predictors of portal vein recanalization should be taken into consideration to identify those who may not benefit from anticoagulation.

Registration: The work was registered in PROSPERO with registration no. CRD42020157142.

Citing Articles

Administration of anticoagulation strategies for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: network meta-analysis.

Li H, Yin F, Ma Y, Gao T, Tao Y, Liu X Front Pharmacol. 2025; 15():1462338.

PMID: 39834816 PMC: 11743941. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1462338.


Thrombotic, Cardiovascular, and Microvascular Complications of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Clonal Hematopoiesis (CHIP): A Narrative Review.

Schafer A, Mann D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458034 PMC: 11508398. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206084.


Analysis of factors related to recanalization of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Shi Y, Feng W, Cai J, Wang Z, Pu Y, Mao W BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):224.

PMID: 39003447 PMC: 11245851. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03322-8.


Systemic Thrombolysis for Isolated Splenic Vein Thrombosis Secondary to Oral Contraceptives: A Case Report.

Li Q, Wang R, Qi X Int J Womens Health. 2024; 16:811-818.

PMID: 38765206 PMC: 11100964. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S462610.


Effectiveness of edoxaban in portal vein thrombosis associated with liver cirrhosis.

Tadokoro T, Tani J, Manabe T, Takuma K, Nakahara M, Oura K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10784.

PMID: 38734732 PMC: 11088711. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60235-y.


References
1.
Intagliata N, Caldwell S, Tripodi A . Diagnosis, Development, and Treatment of Portal Vein Thrombosis in Patients With and Without Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2019; 156(6):1582-1599.e1. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.265. View

2.
Nery F, Chevret S, Condat B, de Raucourt E, Boudaoud L, Rautou P . Causes and consequences of portal vein thrombosis in 1,243 patients with cirrhosis: results of a longitudinal study. Hepatology. 2014; 61(2):660-7. DOI: 10.1002/hep.27546. View

3.
Stine J, Shah P, Cornella S, Rudnick S, Ghabril M, Stukenborg G . Portal vein thrombosis, mortality and hepatic decompensation in patients with cirrhosis: A meta-analysis. World J Hepatol. 2015; 7(27):2774-80. PMC: 4663397. DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i27.2774. View

4.
Simonetto D, Singal A, Garcia-Tsao G, Caldwell S, Ahn J, Kamath P . ACG Clinical Guideline: Disorders of the Hepatic and Mesenteric Circulation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020; 115(1):18-40. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000486. View

5.
De Franchis R . Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015; 63(3):743-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.022. View