» Articles » PMID: 33154926

Validity of the Stent Thrombosis Risk Score in Predicting Early Stent Thrombosis After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Overview
Date 2020 Nov 6
PMID 33154926
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The thrombosis of the stent is one of the most important complications of percutaneous interventions, resulting in complete occlusion of the stented vessel. Aim of this study was to determine the validity of Stent Thrombosis Risk Score (STRS) in predicting early stent thrombosis (ST) after primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI).

Methods: For this study, 569 consecutive patients undergone primary PCI from July 2018 to December 2018 were recruited. Early ST was defined as ST occurred during or within 30 days after the procedure. The STRS was calculated as proposed, developed, and validated in a past study. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off value and area under the curve (AUC).

Results: A total of 569 patients were included, the median age was 56 [61-50] years. Early ST was observed in 33 (5.8%) patients. The median STRS was 4 [5-3] vs. 3 [4-2]; p = 0.009 for patients with and without Early ST respectively. STRS was found to be an independent predictor of early ST with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.41 (1.02-1.95). AUC was 0.631 and the optimal cut-off value was ≥5. Early ST rate was 3.3% at STRS of 0-2, which raised to 5.0% at STR of 3-4, and 17.2% at STRS of ≥5.

Conclusions: In conclusion, STRS was found to be an independent predictor of early ST after primary PCI and has significant discriminating power. The rate of early stent thrombosis after primary PCI exponentially increased at STRS cut-off value of ≥5.

Citing Articles

Patient-Related Factors Predicting Stent Thrombosis in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Anghel L, Tudurachi B, Tudurachi A, Zavoi A, Clement A, Roungos A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068419 PMC: 10707589. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237367.

References
1.
Buchanan G, Basavarajaiah S, Chieffo A . Stent thrombosis: incidence, predictors and new technologies. Thrombosis. 2012; 2012:956962. PMC: 3329679. DOI: 10.1155/2012/956962. View

2.
Brodie B, Pokharel Y, Garg A, Kissling G, Hansen C, Milks S . Predictors of early, late, and very late stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal and drug-eluting stents for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5(10):1043-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.013. View

3.
Luscher T . Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease: the new ESC Atlas and beyond. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(7):489-492. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy070. View

4.
Lasala J, Cox D, Dobies D, Baran K, Bachinsky W, Rogers E . Drug-eluting stent thrombosis in routine clinical practice: two-year outcomes and predictors from the TAXUS ARRIVE registries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2(4):285-93. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.852178.109.852178. View

5.
Garcia-Garcia H, McFadden E, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone G, Spertus J . Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(23):2192-2207. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy223. View