» Articles » PMID: 33154507

Identification of Early Liver Toxicity Gene Biomarkers Using Comparative Supervised Machine Learning

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Nov 6
PMID 33154507
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Screening agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals for potential liver toxicity is required for regulatory approval and is an expensive and time-consuming process. The identification and utilization of early exposure gene signatures and robust predictive models in regulatory toxicity testing has the potential to reduce time and costs substantially. In this study, comparative supervised machine learning approaches were applied to the rat liver TG-GATEs dataset to develop feature selection and predictive testing. We identified ten gene biomarkers using three different feature selection methods that predicted liver necrosis with high specificity and selectivity in an independent validation dataset from the Microarray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study. Nine of the ten genes that were selected with the supervised methods are involved in metabolism and detoxification (Car3, Crat, Cyp39a1, Dcd, Lbp, Scly, Slc23a1, and Tkfc) and transcriptional regulation (Ablim3). Several of these genes are also implicated in liver carcinogenesis, including Crat, Car3 and Slc23a1. Our biomarker gene signature provides high statistical accuracy and a manageable number of genes to study as indicators to potentially accelerate toxicity testing based on their ability to induce liver necrosis and, eventually, liver cancer.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence-powered electrochemical sensor: Recent advances, challenges, and prospects.

Nashruddin S, Salleh F, Yunus R, Zaman H Heliyon. 2024; 10(18):e37964.

PMID: 39328566 PMC: 11425101. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37964.


Progress in toxicogenomics to protect human health.

Meier M, Harrill J, Johnson K, Thomas R, Tong W, Rager J Nat Rev Genet. 2024; 26(2):105-122.

PMID: 39223311 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-024-00767-1.


AI-driven Discovery of Morphomolecular Signatures in Toxicology.

Jaume G, Peeters T, Song A, Pettit R, Williamson D, Oldenburg L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39091765 PMC: 11291055. DOI: 10.1101/2024.07.19.604355.


A novel support vector machine-based 1-day, single-dose prediction model of genotoxic hepatocarcinogenicity in rats.

Gi M, Suzuki S, Kanki M, Yokohira M, Tsukamoto T, Fujioka M Arch Toxicol. 2024; 98(8):2711-2730.

PMID: 38762666 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03755-w.


PFAS and their association with the increased risk of cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women.

Arredondo Eve A, Tunc E, Mehta D, Yoo J, Yilmaz H, Emren S Toxicol Sci. 2024; 200(2):312-323.

PMID: 38758093 PMC: 11285195. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae065.


References
1.
Hanson C, Cairns J, Wang L, Sinha S . Computational discovery of transcription factors associated with drug response. Pharmacogenomics J. 2015; 16(6):573-582. PMC: 4848185. DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2015.74. View

2.
Madak-Erdogan Z, Kim S, Gong P, Zhao Y, Zhang H, Chambliss K . Design of pathway preferential estrogens that provide beneficial metabolic and vascular effects without stimulating reproductive tissues. Sci Signal. 2016; 9(429):ra53. PMC: 4896643. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aad8170. View

3.
Maggioli J, Hoover A, Weng L . Toxicogenomic analysis methods for predictive toxicology. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2005; 53(1):31-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2005.05.006. View

4.
Chicco D, Jurman G . The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation. BMC Genomics. 2020; 21(1):6. PMC: 6941312. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7. View

5.
Ritchie M, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law C, Shi W . limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(7):e47. PMC: 4402510. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. View