» Articles » PMID: 33153569

Optimal Fluoroscopic Projections of Coronary Ostia and Bifurcations Defined by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to define the optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of both coronary ostia and important coronary bifurcations by using 3-dimensional multislice computed tomographic data.

Background: Optimal fluoroscopic projections are crucial for coronary imaging and interventions. Historically, coronary fluoroscopic viewing angles were derived empirically from experienced operators.

Methods: In this analysis, 100 consecutive patients who underwent computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) for suspected coronary artery disease were studied. A CTCA-based method is described to define optimal viewing angles of both coronary ostia and important coronary bifurcations to guide percutaneous coronary interventions.

Results: The average optimal viewing angle for ostial left main stenting was left anterior oblique (LAO) 37°, cranial (CRA) 22° (95% confidence interval [CI]: LAO 33° to 40°, CRA 19° to 25°) and for ostial right coronary stenting was LAO 79°, CRA 41° (95% CI: LAO 74° to 84°, CRA 37° to 45°). Estimated mean optimal viewing angles for bifurcation stenting were as follows: left main: LAO 0°, caudal (CAU) 49° (95% CI: right anterior oblique [RAO] 8° to LAO 8°, CAU 43° to 54°); left anterior descending with first diagonal branch: LAO 11°, CRA 71° (95% CI: RAO 6° to LAO 27°, CRA 66° to 77°); left circumflex bifurcation with first marginal branch: LAO 24°, CAU 33° (95% CI: LAO 15° to 33°, CAU 25° to 41°); and posterior descending artery and posterolateral branch: LAO 44°, CRA 34° (95% CI: LAO 35° to 52°, CRA 27° to 41°).

Conclusions: CTCA can suggest optimal fluoroscopic viewing angles of coronary artery ostia and bifurcations. As the frequency of use of diagnostic CTCA increases in the future, it has the potential to provide additional information for planning and guiding percutaneous coronary intervention procedures.

Citing Articles

Computed Tomography Angiography in the Catheterization Laboratory: A Guide Towards Optimizing Coronary Interventions.

Beneki E, Dimitriadis K, Pyrpyris N, Antonopoulos A, Aznaouridis K, Antiochos P J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39852306 PMC: 11766008. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12010028.


Multimodal Imaging of Coronary Bifurcation TAP Procedures Utilizing Visible Heart® Methodologies: EBC Recommended Steps and Bailout Procedures.

Stankovic G, Cangemi S, DeVos A, Burzotta F, Iaizzo P Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024; 105(1):135-143.

PMID: 39660931 PMC: 11694539. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31326.


Interventional Applications for an Ostial Protection Guidewire-The WALPO Technique.

Leibundgut G, Kovacic M, Cocoi M, Rinfret S Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024; 104(7):1447-1451.

PMID: 39465654 PMC: 11667404. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31274.


The Balloon-Assisted Double-Kissing T-Stenting Technique: Concept, In Vitro Model, and Case Examples.

Rinfret S, Verreault-Julien L, Croce K J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(7):101928.

PMID: 39132000 PMC: 11307903. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101928.


Quantitative Flow Ratio Based on Murray Fractal Law: Accuracy of Single Versus Two Angiographic Views.

Ding D, Tu S, Chang Y, Li C, Xu B, Wijns W J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 1(5):100399.

PMID: 39131462 PMC: 11307523. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100399.