Improving the Quality of Systematic Reviews in Spinal Surgery Requires Community-Wide Engagement and Pragmatism
Overview
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles
Gillespie C, Fung K, Alam A, Yanez Touzet A, Dhesi J, Edlmann E Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023; 165(7):1975-1986.
PMID: 37249690 PMC: 10319658. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05618-2.
Existing Funding Sources in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research: Scoping Review.
Bestwick H, Teh J, Mowforth O, Grodzinski B, Kotter M, Davies B Interact J Med Res. 2022; 11(1):e36194.
PMID: 35771617 PMC: 9284365. DOI: 10.2196/36194.
References
1.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M
. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015; 350:g7647.
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
View
2.
Gnanalingham K, Davies B, Balamurali G, Titoria P, Doyle P, Abou-Zeid A
. Improving levels of evidence in studies published in spinal journals from 1983 to 2011. Br J Neurosurg. 2013; 27(2):152-5.
DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2012.737957.
View
3.
Dettori J, Skelly A, Brodt E
. Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals. Global Spine J. 2020; 10(5):667-673.
PMC: 7359690.
DOI: 10.1177/2192568220917926.
View
4.
Amiri A, Kanesalingam K, Cro S, Casey A
. Does source of funding and conflict of interest influence the outcome and quality of spinal research?. Spine J. 2013; 14(2):308-14.
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.047.
View
5.
Davies B, Khan D, Mowforth O, McNair A, Gronlund T, Kolias A
. RE-CODE DCM (search Objectives and ommon ata lements for egenerative ervical yelopathy): A Consensus Process to Improve Research Efficiency in DCM, Through Establishment of a Standardized Dataset for Clinical Research and the Definition of the.... Global Spine J. 2019; 9(1 Suppl):65S-76S.
PMC: 6512197.
DOI: 10.1177/2192568219832855.
View