» Articles » PMID: 3314791

Teen Contraception: a Review of Perspectives on Compliance

Overview
Journal Arch Sex Behav
Date 1987 Aug 1
PMID 3314791
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

National attention has been drawn to the near epidemic rates of teen-age pregnancy in this country, with greater psychological understanding of this problem cited as a research need. This paper reviews available literature on teen contraceptive compliance with particular focus on the development of self-regulation. In this first section, programs designed to enhance teens' choice and use of birth control are reviewed, with specific attention given to emerging issues and methodological concerns. In the second section, studies that examine factors predictive of contraceptive use in teen-age girls are discussed. This literature is grouped according to three conceptual systems: medical perspectives, behavioral theory, and self-regulation and self-control approaches. A summary is presented, specifying ways in which conceptually based research findings can assist in program development to address the problem of teen pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Power in college students' contraceptive decisions.

McCormick N, GAEDDERT W Arch Sex Behav. 1989; 18(1):35-48.

PMID: 2712684 DOI: 10.1007/BF01579290.

References
1.
Gilchrist L, Schinke S . Coping with contraception: cognitive and behavioral methods with adolescents. Cognit Ther Res. 1983; 7(5):379-88. DOI: 10.1007/BF01187166. View

2.
Carver C, Scheier M . Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull. 1982; 92(1):111-35. View

3.
Westoff C, Calot G, Foster A . Teenage fertility in developed nations: 1971-1980. Fam Plann Perspect. 1983; 15(3):105-8, 110. View

4.
Bandura A . Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84(2):191-215. DOI: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. View

5.
ROVINSKY J . Abortion recidivism. A problem in preventive medicine. Obstet Gynecol. 1972; 39(5):649-59. View