» Articles » PMID: 33146302

Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy: Prevalence and Associated Factors

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2020 Nov 4
PMID 33146302
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify the prevalence of violence during pregnancy and the association with the socioeconomic, behavioral and clinical characteristics of pregnant women.

Methods: Cross-sectional study in a low-risk maternity hospital in the municipality of Cariacica, Espírito Santo. A total of 330 puerperal women were interviewed from August to October 2017. Information on socioeconomic, behavioral, reproductive and clinical characteristics, as well as life experiences, was collected through a questionnaire. To identify the types of violence, the proper World Health Organization instrument was used. Gross bivariate and multivariate analysis was performed and adjusted for Poisson regression with robust variance.

Results: Prevalence was 16.1% (95%CI 2.5-20.4) for psychological violence, 7.6% (95%CI 5.1-11.0) for physical violence and 2.7% (95%CI 1.4-5.2) for sexual violence. Psychological violence remained associated with age, family income, beginning of sexual life, disease in pregnancy, desire to interrupt pregnancy and number of partners. Physical violence was associated with schooling, beginning of sexual life and disease in pregnancy. Sexual violence remained associated with marital status and desire to interrupt pregnancy (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Psychological violence by an intimate partner was the most prevalent among pregnant women. Women that were younger, had lower income and less schooling, who started their sexual life before the age of 14 and who wished to interrupt pregnancy, experienced violence more frequently during pregnancy.

Citing Articles

Study on the current situation and spatial distribution of intimate partner violence among Chinese residents.

Zhang R, Qu G, Sun Y, Feng J, Lei Z, Li X Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1491747.

PMID: 40051507 PMC: 11884244. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1491747.


Women's exposure to intimate partner violence and its association with child stunting: findings from a population-based study in rural Rwanda.

Utumatwishima J, Mogren I, Elfving K, Umubyeyi A, Mansourian A, Krantz G Glob Health Action. 2024; 17(1):2414527.

PMID: 39411828 PMC: 11485766. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2024.2414527.


Factors associated with depression during pregnancy in women receiving high- and low-risk prenatal care: a predictive model.

Albertini J, Benute G, Francisco R, Galletta M Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1326151.

PMID: 39045551 PMC: 11263013. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1326151.


Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and time to return to sexual activity after childbirth: analysis of the BRISA prenatal cohort.

Abreu L, Batalha M, Aristizabal L, Costa L, Batista R Cad Saude Publica. 2024; 40(5):e00094223.

PMID: 38896592 PMC: 11186617. DOI: 10.1590/0102-311XEN094223.


Relationship of domestic violence with pregnancy symptoms and pregnancy experience in Iranian pregnant women: a cross-sectional study.

Aliasghari F, Effati-Daryani F, Mohammadi A, Mirghafourvand M BMJ Open. 2024; 14(4):e082570.

PMID: 38670608 PMC: 11057274. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082570.


References
1.
Fanslow J, Silva M, Robinson E, Whitehead A . Violence during pregnancy: associations with pregnancy intendedness, pregnancy-related care, and alcohol and tobacco use among a representative sample of New Zealand women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008; 48(4):398-404. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00890.x. View

2.
Audi C, Segall-Correa A, Santiago S, Perez-Escamilla R . Adverse health events associated with domestic violence during pregnancy among Brazilian women. Midwifery. 2011; 28(4):356-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.05.010. View

3.
Rodrigues D, Gomes-Sponholz F, Stefanelo J, Nakano A, Monteiro J . [Intimate partner violence against pregnant women: study about the repercussions on the obstetric and neonatal results]. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014; 48(2):206-13. DOI: 10.1590/s0080-623420140000200002. View

4.
Urquia M, OCampo P, Ray J . Marital status, duration of cohabitation, and psychosocial well-being among childbearing women: a canadian nationwide survey. Am J Public Health. 2012; 103(2):e8-e15. PMC: 3558760. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301116. View

5.
Fonseca R, Santos D, Gessner R, Fornari L, Oliveira R, Schoenmaker M . Gender, sexuality and violence: perception of mobilized adolescents in an online game. Rev Bras Enferm. 2018; 71(suppl 1):607-614. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0561. View