» Articles » PMID: 33143667

A Comparison Study of Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression and Posterior Decompressive Laminectomy in the Treatment of Thoracic Spinal Stenosis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2020 Nov 4
PMID 33143667
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic decompression (PED) is considered a minimally invasive and safe procedure in lumbar degenerative disease. Few authors report the success of PED for thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) with thoracic myelopathy. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome of PED versus posterior decompressive laminectomy (PDL) for TSS.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for single-level TSS from January 1, 2015 to May 1, 2019.These patients were divided into PED (n = 16) and PDL(n = 14) group. Preoperative demographic characteristics and perioperative outcomes were reviewed. Pre- and postoperative neurological status was evaluated using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score and the recovery rate (RR).

Results: The patients' mean age was 57.3 years (27-76) in PED group and 58.8 years (34-77) in PDL group. No statistical difference was found between two groups with regards to neurological status at pre-operative and final follow-up. The RR in PED group achieved the same improvement as PDL group (87.5% vs 85.7%, P > 0.05), while the PED brought advantages in operative time(m) (86.4 vs 132.1, p < 0.05), blood loss (mL) (18.21 vs 228.57, p < 0.05),drainage volume(mL) (15.5 vs 601.4, p < 0.05), and hospital stay (d) (3.6 vs 5.6, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Both PED and PDL showed favorable outcome in the treatment of TSS. Besides, PED had advantages in reducing traumatization. In terms of perioperative quality of life, PED could be an efficient supplement to traditional posterior decompressive laminectomy in patients with TSS.

Citing Articles

Unilateral biportal endoscopic surgical decompression for symptomatic ossification of the ligamentum flavum - Is it enough to improve the clinical outcome? A case-control study.

Rizki Gatam A, Noor E, Gatam L J Orthop. 2024; 53:150-155.

PMID: 38601893 PMC: 11001628. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.037.

References
1.
Ikuta K, Tarukado K, Senba H, Kitamura T, Komiya N, Fukutoku Y . Decompression procedure using a microendoscopic technique for thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2012; 54(5-6):271-3. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1297986. View

2.
Yoon S, Ahn S, Kim K, Kim Y, Cho J, Kim D . Comparative Study of the Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using the Tubular Retractor System Based on the VAS, ODI, and SF-36. Korean J Spine. 2015; 9(3):215-22. PMC: 4431005. DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.3.215. View

3.
Xiong C, Li T, Kang H, Hu H, Han J, Xu F . Early outcomes of 270-degree spinal canal decompression by using TESSYS-ISEE technique in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with disk herniation. Eur Spine J. 2018; 28(1):78-86. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5655-4. View

4.
Osman N, Cheung Z, Hussain A, Phan K, Arvind V, Vig K . Outcomes and Complications Following Laminectomy Alone for Thoracic Myelopathy due to Ossified Ligamentum Flavum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(14):E842-E848. PMC: 6252088. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002563. View

5.
Liao C, Chen T, Jung S, Chen L . Surgical experience with symptomatic thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 2(1):34-9. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.1.0034. View