» Articles » PMID: 33137146

Not Exodus, but Population Increase and Gene Flow Restoration in Cantabrian Brown Bear (Ursus Arctos) Subpopulations. Comment on Gregório Et Al. 2020

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Nov 2
PMID 33137146
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a genetic study on brown bears (Ursus arctos) in the Cantabrian Mountains, Gregório et al. (2020) interpreted the asymmetrical gene flow they found from the eastern subpopulation towards the western one as an exodus of bears forced to flee from the eastern nucleus "with higher human disturbance and poaching", concluding that connectivity may be operating as a means for eastern Cantabrian bears to find more suitable territories. In this reply, we maintain that the explanations of Gregorio et al. contradict the source-sink theory and we also present demographic data not considered by these authors showing that the eastern subpopulation is not declining, but persistently increasing. After reviewing the demographic and genetic studies published during the last 20 years, we conclude that the connectivity between the two subpopulations is operating as a route which allows the regular movement of males and the restoration of the gene flow across the whole Cantabrian population.

Citing Articles

Presence-only data for wild ungulates and red fox in Spain based on hunting yields over a 10-year period.

Illanas S, Fernandez-Lopez J, Vicente J, Ruiz-Rodriguez C, Lopez-Padilla S, Sebastian-Pardo M Sci Data. 2025; 12(1):236.

PMID: 39929836 PMC: 11811294. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04574-z.


And yet, migration, population growth or mortality are not balanced among Cantabrian brown bear subpopulations. Reply to Blanco et al (2020).

Ferreira E, Gregorio I, Barros T, Pando D, Morante J, Barbosa A PLoS One. 2021; 16(10):e0256432.

PMID: 34644301 PMC: 8513912. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256432.

References
1.
Sahlen V, Ordiz A, Swenson J, Stoen O . Behavioural differences between single scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos) and females with dependent young when experimentally approached by humans. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):e0121576. PMC: 4382168. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121576. View

2.
Dias P . Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 11(8):326-30. DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10037-9. View

3.
Matosiuk M, Smietana W, Czajkowska M, Paule L, Stofik J, Krajmerova D . Genetic differentiation and asymmetric gene flow among Carpathian brown bear () populations-Implications for conservation of transboundary populations. Ecol Evol. 2019; 9(3):1501-1511. PMC: 6374679. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4872. View

4.
Chapron G, Kaczensky P, Linnell J, von Arx M, Huber D, Andren H . Recovery of large carnivores in Europe's modern human-dominated landscapes. Science. 2014; 346(6216):1517-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1257553. View

5.
Ordiz A, Stoen O, Delibes M, Swenson J . Predators or prey? Spatio-temporal discrimination of human-derived risk by brown bears. Oecologia. 2011; 166(1):59-67. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-1920-5. View