» Articles » PMID: 33123512

Prediction of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis After Posterior Scoliosis Surgery With Machine Learning in the Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patient

Overview
Date 2020 Oct 30
PMID 33123512
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To build a model for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) prognostication in Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing long posterior instrumentation and fusion surgery by machine learning and analyze the risk factors for PJK.

Materials And Methods: In total, 44 AIS patients (female/male: 34/10; PJK/non-PJK: 34/10) who met the inclusion criteria between January 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively recruited from West China Hospital. Thirty-seven clinical and radiological features were acquired by two independent investigators. Univariate analyses between PJK and non-PJK groups were carried out. Twelve models were built by using four types of machine learning algorithms in conjunction with two oversampling methods [the synthetic minority technique (SMOTE) and random oversampling]. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used for model discrimination, and the clinical utility was evaluated by using F1 score and accuracy. The risk factors were simultaneously analyzed by a Cox regression and machine learning.

Results: Statistical differences between PJK and non-PJK groups were as follows: gender ( = 0.001), preoperative factors [thoracic kyphosis ( = 0.03), T1 slope angle (T1S, = 0.078)], and postoperative factors [T1S ( = 0.097), proximal junctional angle ( = 0.003), upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) - UIV + 1 ( = 0.001)]. Random forest using SMOTE achieved the best prediction performance with AUC = 0.944, accuracy = 0.909, and F1 score = 0.667 on independent testing dataset. Cox model revealed that male gender and larger preoperative T1S were independent prognostic factors of PJK (odds ratio = 10.701 and 57.074, respectively). Gender was also at the first place in the importance ranking of the model with best performance.

Conclusion: The random forest using SMOTE model has the great value for predicting the individual risk of developing PJK after long instrumentation and fusion surgery in Lenke 5 AIS patients. Moreover, the combination of the outcomes of a Cox model and the feature ranking extracted by machine learning is more valuable than any one alone, especially in the interpretation of risk factors.

Citing Articles

Predicting pediatric patient rehabilitation outcomes after spinal deformity surgery with artificial intelligence.

Shi W, Giuste F, Zhu Y, Tamo B, Nnamdi M, Hornback A Commun Med (Lond). 2025; 5(1):1.

PMID: 39747461 PMC: 11697361. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-024-00726-1.


Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary.

Yahanda A, Joseph K, Bui T, Greenberg J, Ray W, Ogunlade J Global Spine J. 2024; 15(2):1445-1454.

PMID: 39359113 PMC: 11559723. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241290752.


Systematic review and meta-analysis for the proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Zhao J, Huang C, Liu Y, Liu D, Liao D Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1387841.

PMID: 39205666 PMC: 11350560. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1387841.


Sagittal Balance Parameters and Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Katzouraki G, Vasiliadis E, Kaspiris A, Evangelopoulos D, Grivas T, Pneumatikos S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610660 PMC: 11012752. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071895.


Incidence and risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after correction surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Ji X, Wei L, Xing Z, Duan Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):217.

PMID: 38566085 PMC: 10988869. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04638-7.


References
1.
Hollenbeck S, Glattes R, Asher M, Lai S, Burton D . The prevalence of increased proximal junctional flexion following posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(15):1675-81. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b5bea. View

2.
Ji Z, Meng G, Huang D, Yue X, Wang B . NMFBFS: A NMF-Based Feature Selection Method in Identifying Pivotal Clinical Symptoms of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015; 2015:846942. PMC: 4633688. DOI: 10.1155/2015/846942. View

3.
Peng H, Zhao W, Tan H, Ji Z, Li J, Li K . Prediction of treatment efficacy for prostate cancer using a mathematical model. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:21599. PMC: 4751505. DOI: 10.1038/srep21599. View

4.
Alzakri A, Vergari C, Van den Abbeele M, Gille O, Skalli W, Obeid I . Global Sagittal Alignment and Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2019; 7(2):236-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.06.014. View

5.
Lan L, Cai Y, Zhang T, Wu R, Xue M, Meng Q . Influencing factors of inpatient expenditure pattern for cancer in China, 2015. Chin J Cancer Res. 2017; 29(1):11-17. PMC: 5348471. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.01.02. View