» Articles » PMID: 33117251

Characteristics of Non-linguistic Cognitive Impairment in Post-stroke Aphasia Patients

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2020 Oct 29
PMID 33117251
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Non-linguistic cognitive training has been suggested to improve the communication skills of patients with post-stroke aphasia (PSA). However, the association between language and non-linguistic cognitive functions is not fully understood. In this study, we used the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) to evaluate the characteristics of non-linguistic cognitive impairments in Chinese PSA patients. A total of 86 stroke patients were recruited in this study. Language and non-linguistic cognitive impairments were evaluated by the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) and LOTCA, respectively. The patients were divided into two groups (PSA and non-PSA), and the Chinese norm (the data came from 44 Chinese individuals without neurological disorders in a previous study) was used as the control group. The LOTCA scores were compared among the three groups. Patients in the PSA group were subdivided into the fluent aphasia group (FAG) and the non-FAG according to the Chinese aphasia fluency characteristic scale. The LOTCA scores were also compared between the PSA subdivisions. Potential confounders were adjusted in the analysis of covariance. Partial correlation analysis between the subscores of WAB and LOTCA was also performed. The total LOTCA scores in the PSA group (75.11 ± 17.08) were significantly lower compared with scores in the non-PSA (96.80 ± 7.75, < 0.001) and the control group (97.65 ± 16.24, < 0.001). The PSA group also had lower orientation, visual perception (VP), spatial perception (SP), visuomotor organization, thinking operation, and attention scores. The total LOTCA, orientation, VP, SP, and MP scores were lower in the non-FAG (69.24 ± 18.06, 8.62 ± 5.09, 12.76 ± 2.47, 7.48 ± 3.01, and 9.62 ± 2.25, respectively) compared with the FAG (80.36 ± 14.07, 12.14 ± 3.99, 14.09 ± 1.93, 9.68 ± 3.01, 10.55 ± 1.63, respectively, 's < 0.05). The aphasia quotient was positively correlated with the total score of LOTCA and scores of orientation, VP, SP, and MP ( = 0.710, 0.744, 0.565, 0.597, and 0.616; < 0.001). Compared with stroke patients without aphasia, patients with PSA often have more extensive and serious non-linguistic cognitive impairments. Patients with non-fluent aphasia often present with serious cognitive impairments than those with fluent aphasia, especially the impairments of orientation and SP. Non-linguistic cognitive impairments correlate with language impairments in aphasia.

Citing Articles

Comparative Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Kong Q, Wang J, Huang X, He J, Chang J Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024; 38(11-12):863-876.

PMID: 39256985 PMC: 11566095. DOI: 10.1177/15459683241274755.


Switching attention deficits in post-stroke individuals with different aphasia types.

Kuptsova S, Dragoy O, Ivanova M Aphasiology. 2023; 37(2):260-287.

PMID: 36699113 PMC: 9873226. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2021.2002804.


How Much Attention Do We Pay to Attention Deficits in Poststroke Aphasia?.

Varkanitsa M, Godecke E, Kiran S Stroke. 2022; 54(1):55-66.

PMID: 36542078 PMC: 9927868. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.037936.


Comparison of three cognitive assessment methods in post-stroke aphasia patients.

Yan Z, Xu S, Wei D, He X, Li C, Zhang Y Front Psychol. 2022; 13:896095.

PMID: 36337480 PMC: 9631299. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896095.


A Mobile-based Virtual Reality Speech Rehabilitation App for Patients With Aphasia After Stroke: Development and Pilot Usability Study.

Bu X, Ng P, Tong Y, Chen P, Fan R, Tang Q JMIR Serious Games. 2022; 10(2):e30196.

PMID: 35389349 PMC: 9031062. DOI: 10.2196/30196.


References
1.
Kang E, Jeong H, Moon E, Lee J, Lee K . Cognitive and Language Function in Aphasic Patients Assessed With the Korean Version of Mini-Mental Status Examination. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016; 40(1):152-61. PMC: 4775749. DOI: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.152. View

2.
Zhou Q, Lu X, Zhang Y, Sun Z, Li J, Zhu Z . Telerehabilitation Combined Speech-Language and Cognitive Training Effectively Promoted Recovery in Aphasia Patients. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2312. PMC: 6262900. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02312. View

3.
Simic T, Rochon E, Greco E, Martino R . Baseline executive control ability and its relationship to language therapy improvements in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017; 29(3):395-439. DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2017.1307768. View

4.
Brownsett S, Warren J, Geranmayeh F, Woodhead Z, Leech R, Wise R . Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke. Brain. 2013; 137(Pt 1):242-54. PMC: 3891442. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt289. View

5.
Salis C, Kelly H, Code C . Assessment and treatment of short-term and working memory impairments in stroke aphasia: a practical tutorial. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015; 50(6):721-36. DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12172. View