» Articles » PMID: 33116727

The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: 100 Years Later

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2020 Oct 29
PMID 33116727
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For over 100 years, the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has been the cornerstone for detecting prediabetes and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In recent decades, controversies have arisen identifying internationally acceptable cut points using fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-h post-load glucose (2-h PG), and/or HbA1c for defining intermediate hyperglycemia (prediabetes). Despite this, there has been a steadfast global consensus of the 2-h PG for defining dysglycemic states during the OGTT. This article reviews the history of the OGTT and recent advances in its application, including the glucose challenge test and mathematical modeling for determining the shape of the glucose curve. Pitfalls of the FPG, 2-h PG during the OGTT, and HbA1c are considered as well. Finally, the associations between the 30-minute and 1-hour plasma glucose (1-h PG) levels derived from the OGTT and incidence of diabetes and its complications will be reviewed. The considerable evidence base supports modifying current screening and diagnostic recommendations with the use of the 1-h PG. Measurement of the 1-h PG level could increase the likelihood of identifying high-risk individuals when the pancreatic ß-cell function is substantially more intact with the added practical advantage of potentially replacing the conventional 2-h OGTT making it more acceptable in the clinical setting.

Citing Articles

Unveiling inequalities: Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in diabetes: Findings from the 2007-2020 NHANES data among U.S. adults.

Deng Y, Moniruzzaman M, Rogers B, Hu L, Jagannathan R, Tamura K Prev Med Rep. 2025; 50:102957.

PMID: 40007950 PMC: 11852695. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102957.


Insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction in individuals with normal glucose tolerance but elevated 1-h post-load plasma glucose.

Nie Q, Jin X, Mu Y, Huang Y, Dong A Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 16:1507107.

PMID: 39963280 PMC: 11830579. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1507107.


Effects of Frozen Red Dragon Fruit Consumption on Metabolic Markers in Healthy Subjects and Individuals at Risk of Type 2 Diabetes.

Flores-Verastegui M, Coe S, Tammam J, Almahjoubi H, Bridle R, Bi S Nutrients. 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39940297 PMC: 11821054. DOI: 10.3390/nu17030441.


FINDRISC modified for Cuba as a tool for the detection of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in cuban population.

Cabrera-Rode E, Diaz-Diaz O, Orlandi Gonzalez N, Ronald M Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2025; 41(4):351-364.

PMID: 39936758 PMC: 11797583. DOI: 10.17843/rpmesp.2024.414.14138.


Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics data revealed role of insulin resistant SNW1 gene in the pathophysiology of gestational diabetes.

Bhushan R, Trivedi R, Raj R, Rani A, Rai S, Tripathi A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4159.

PMID: 39905161 PMC: 11794551. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88485-4.


References
1.
Ferrara A, Hedderson M, Quesenberry C, Selby J . Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus detected by the national diabetes data group or the carpenter and coustan plasma glucose thresholds. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25(9):1625-30. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.9.1625. View

2.
Ford C, Leet R, Kipling L, Rhee M, Jackson S, Wilson P . Racial differences in performance of HbA for the classification of diabetes and prediabetes among US adults of non-Hispanic black and white race. Diabet Med. 2019; 36(10):1234-1242. PMC: 7282707. DOI: 10.1111/dme.13979. View

3.
. WHO Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus: second report. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1980; 646:1-80. View

4.
Allison D, Paultre F, Maggio C, Mezzitis N, Pi-Sunyer F . The use of areas under curves in diabetes research. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18(2):245-50. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.18.2.245. View

5.
Casagrande S, Cowie C, Genuth S . Self-reported prevalence of diabetes screening in the U.S., 2005-2010. Am J Prev Med. 2014; 47(6):780-7. PMC: 4254011. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.039. View