» Articles » PMID: 33114264

Lessons Learned from Japan's Response to the First Wave of COVID-19: A Content Analysis

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Oct 29
PMID 33114264
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While the epidemiological impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been relatively moderate in East-Asian countries, the pandemic has significantly impacted on citizens' lives and livelihoods, and Japan is no exception. In the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, Japan managed unprecedented quarantines and realized the difficulty of controlling COVID-19, finally recording a relatively high number of deaths per million in the Western Pacific region. However, scant research has highlighted the distinctive features of Japan's reaction and the challenges encountered. To clarify these points and examine Japan's first response to COVID-19, we performed a content analysis. Minutes of expert meetings were analyzed from multiple viewpoints, including epidemiology, health systems, border control, and health communication. The obscure evolution of the testing strategy, the usefulness of retrospective contact tracing, the rapid scientific risk assessment, a sluggish expansion of health system capacity and response in border control, and misunderstanding between risk communication and crisis communication are made evident by our analysis. Examining previous responses and gathering lessons learned in each country will improve global responses to COVID-19 and strengthen regional health security. Therefore, while investing in public health and ensuring transparency, Japan needs to clarify the previous decision-making process of each countermeasure towards COVID-19.

Citing Articles

Defining and identifying the critical elements of operational readiness for public health emergency events: a rapid scoping review.

English R, Carlson H, Geduld H, Nyasulu J, Louw Q, Berner K BMJ Glob Health. 2024; 9(8).

PMID: 39209763 PMC: 11367384. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014379.


COVID-19 Pandemic Risk Assessment: Systematic Review.

Chu A, Kwok P, Chan J, So M Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024; 17:903-925.

PMID: 38623576 PMC: 11017986. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S444494.


Editorial: Assessing and evaluating the psychosocial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on anxiety and stress: perspectives from East Asia.

Zhou Q, Wang J, Duan W, Ye B Front Psychiatry. 2024; 14:1353718.

PMID: 38250255 PMC: 10796782. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1353718.


Lessons from health insurance responses in counteracting COVID-19: a qualitative comparative analysis of South Korea and three influential countries.

Ko H, Yun E, Ahn B, Lee H, Jang W, Lee J Arch Public Health. 2023; 81(1):205.

PMID: 37990238 PMC: 10664685. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01209-w.


Improvement of the software for modeling the dynamics of epidemics and developing a user-friendly interface.

Nesteruk I Infect Dis Model. 2023; 8(3):806-821.

PMID: 37496830 PMC: 10366461. DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2023.06.003.


References
1.
Mckee M, Gill M, Wollaston S . Public inquiry into UK's response to covid-19. BMJ. 2020; 369:m2052. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2052. View

2.
Tokuda Y, Sakihama T, Aoki M, Taniguchi K, Deshpande G, Suzuki S . COVID-19 outbreak on the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship in February 2020. J Gen Fam Med. 2020; 21(4):95-97. PMC: 7388675. DOI: 10.1002/jgf2.326. View

3.
Iwasaki A, Grubaugh N . Why does Japan have so few cases of COVID-19?. EMBO Mol Med. 2020; 12(5):e12481. PMC: 7207161. DOI: 10.15252/emmm.202012481. View

4.
Shirai C, Fujiyama R, Uchino E, Irie F, Takatoriges T, Iso H . [Evaluation of the flu call center and medical system data on pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza. Comparison of cases in Kobe city and Ibaraki prefecture]. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2012; 59(9):684-92. View

5.
Garcia-Basteiro A, Legido-Quigley H . Evaluation of the COVID-19 response in Spain: principles and requirements. Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5(11):e575. PMC: 7505572. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30208-5. View