» Articles » PMID: 33102389

Clinical Implications of Genomic Evaluations for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification, Screening, and Treatment: a Narrative Review

Overview
Journal Prostate Int
Date 2020 Oct 26
PMID 33102389
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

New classification systems based on molecular features have been introduced to improve precision medicine for prostate cancer (PCa). This review covers the increasing risk of PCa and the differences in response to targeted therapy that are related to specific gene variations. We believe that genomic evaluations will be useful for guiding PCa risk stratification, screening, and treatment. We searched the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for articles related to genomic testing for PCa that were published in 2020 or earlier. There is increasing evidence that germline mutations in DNA repair genes, such as or , are closely related to the development and aggressiveness of PCa. Targeted prostate-specific antigen screening based on the presence of germline alterations in DNA repair genes is recommend to achieve an early diagnosis of PCa. In cases of localized PCa, even if it has a favorable risk classification, patients under active surveillance with these gene alterations are likely to develop aggressive PCa. Thus, active treatment may be preferable to active surveillance for these patients. In cases of metastatic castration-resistant PCa, and DNA mismatch repair genes may be useful biomarkers for predicting the response to androgen receptor-targeting agents, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, platinum chemotherapy, prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radium-223. Genomic evaluations may allow for risk stratification of patients with PCa based on their molecular features, which may help guide precision medicine for treating PCa.

Citing Articles

Management considerations and treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed prostate cancer in advanced age patients (≥80 years): real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period.

Xiao X, Wang J, Wang Y, Xu Y, Liu R, Guo S Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(8):1506-1516.

PMID: 39280648 PMC: 11399059. DOI: 10.21037/tau-24-134.


Tissue-Based Genomic Testing in Prostate Cancer: 10-Year Analysis of National Trends on the Use of Prolaris, Decipher, ProMark, and Oncotype DX.

Bologna E, Ditonno F, Licari L, Franco A, Manfredi C, Mossack S Clin Pract. 2024; 14(2):508-520.

PMID: 38525718 PMC: 10961791. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14020039.


Case report: Exceptional and durable response to Radium-223 and suspension of androgen deprivation therapy in a metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient.

Zacchi F, Carles J, Gonzalez M, Maldonado X, Perez-Lopez R, Semidey M Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1331643.

PMID: 38525428 PMC: 10959003. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1331643.


The Correlations between the Intensity of Histopathological Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 11 Staining and Progression of Prostate Cancer.

Kim J, Yang H, Lee K, Park J, Lee C, Jeon Y Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(12).

PMID: 38139829 PMC: 10747236. DOI: 10.3390/ph16121703.


Mutational spectrum of DNA damage and mismatch repair genes in prostate cancer.

Bugoye F, Torrorey-Sawe R, Biegon R, Dharsee N, Mafumiko F, Patel K Front Genet. 2023; 14:1231536.

PMID: 37732318 PMC: 10507418. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1231536.


References
1.
Antonarakis E, Shaukat F, Velho P, Kaur H, Shenderov E, Pardoll D . Clinical Features and Therapeutic Outcomes in Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer and DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Mutations. Eur Urol. 2018; 75(3):378-382. PMC: 6377812. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.009. View

2.
Loeb S, Bjurlin M, Nicholson J, Tammela T, Penson D, Carter H . Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014; 65(6):1046-55. PMC: 4113338. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.062. View

3.
Paschalis A, Sheehan B, Riisnaes R, Nava Rodrigues D, Gurel B, Bertan C . Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Heterogeneity and DNA Repair Defects in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2019; 76(4):469-478. PMC: 6853166. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.030. View

4.
De Laere B, Oeyen S, Mayrhofer M, Whitington T, Van Dam P, Van Oyen P . Outperforms Other Androgen Receptor Biomarkers to Predict Abiraterone or Enzalutamide Outcome in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 25(6):1766-1773. PMC: 6330086. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1943. View

5.
Das S, Salami S, Spratt D, Kaffenberger S, Jacobs M, Morgan T . Bringing Prostate Cancer Germline Genetics into Clinical Practice. J Urol. 2019; 202(2):223-230. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000137. View