» Articles » PMID: 33100884

Is Apparent Instability a Guiding Feature in Visual Search?

Overview
Journal Vis cogn
Specialties Neurology
Psychology
Date 2020 Oct 26
PMID 33100884
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans are quick to notice if an object is unstable. Does that assessment require attention or can instability serve as a preattentive feature that can guide the deployment of attention? This paper describes a series of visual search experiments, designed to address this question. Experiment 1 shows that less stable images among more stable images are found more efficiently than more stable among less stable; a search asymmetry that supports guidance by instability. Experiment 2 shows efficient search but no search asymmetry when the orientation of the objects is removed as a confound. Experiment 3 independently varies the orientation cues and perceived stability and finds a clear main effect of apparent stability. Experiment 4 shows converging evidence for a role of stability using different stimuli that lack an orientation cue. However, here both search for stable and unstable targets is inefficient. Experiment 5 is a control for Experiment 4, showing that the stability effect in Experiment 4 is not simple side-effects of the geometry of the stimuli. On balance, the data support a role for instability in the guidance of attention in visual search. (184 words).

Citing Articles

Invariant representations in abstract concept grounding - the physical world in grounded cognition.

Friedrich J, Fischer M, Raab M Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 31(6):2558-2580.

PMID: 38806790 PMC: 11680661. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02522-3.


The Pulfrich solidity illusion: a surprising demonstration of the visual system's tolerance of solidity violations.

Bai D, Strickland B Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 30(5):1782-1787.

PMID: 36964479 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02271-9.


Similarity and Dissimilarity in Perceptual Organization: On the Complexity of the Gestalt Principle of Similarity.

Pinna B, Porcheddu D, Skilters J Vision (Basel). 2022; 6(3).

PMID: 35893756 PMC: 9326748. DOI: 10.3390/vision6030039.


Invariant representation of physical stability in the human brain.

Pramod R, Cohen M, Tenenbaum J, Kanwisher N Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 35635277 PMC: 9150889. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.71736.

References
1.
Wolfe J, Palmer E, Horowitz T . Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search. Vision Res. 2009; 50(14):1304-11. PMC: 2891283. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.002. View

2.
Wolfe J . Visual Search Revived: The Slopes Are Not That Slippery: A Reply to Kristjansson (2015). Iperception. 2016; 7(3):2041669516643244. PMC: 4934667. DOI: 10.1177/2041669516643244. View

3.
Royden C, Wolfe J, Klempen N . Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields. Percept Psychophys. 2001; 63(3):436-44. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194410. View

4.
Wolfe J, Held R . Gravity and the tilt aftereffect. Vision Res. 1982; 22(8):1075-8. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90046-3. View

5.
Carrasco M, McLean T, KATZ S, Frieder K . Feature asymmetries in visual search: effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency. Vision Res. 1998; 38(3):347-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00152-1. View