» Articles » PMID: 33095649

The Safety of Primary Surgical Excision of Small Deep Indeterminate Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Masses

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2020 Oct 23
PMID 33095649
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine the suitability of primary excision of small indeterminate deep soft tissue masses presenting to a tertiary musculoskeletal oncology service.

Methods And Materials: Review of all patients referred to a specialist musculoskeletal oncology service over a 20-month period with a deep indeterminate soft tissue mass by non-contrast MRI criteria that was recommended for primary surgical excision due to relatively small size (<30 mm). Data collected included age, gender, site and maximal size of the lesion, and final histological diagnosis for excised lesions.

Results: 85 patients were included, mean lesion size being 12 mm (range 5-29 mm). Primary surgical resection had been undertaken in 69 cases (81.2%) by the conclusion of data collection, 36 males and 33 females with mean age of 45.6 years (range 11-80 years). Of these, 11 cases (15.9%) were non-neoplastic, 53 (76.8%) were benign, 1 (1.4%) was intermediate grade, while 4 (5.8%) were malignant including 3 synovial sarcomas. Two of these were treated with re-excision of the tumour bed showing no residual disease, with no evidence of local recurrence at a mean of 10.7 months post-excision.

Conclusion: Primary surgical excision of small deep soft tissue masses that are indeterminate by non-contrast MRI criteria is considered a safe procedure when undertaken in a specialist musculoskeletal oncology service, with only 4 of 69 cases (5.8%) being malignant.

Advances In Knowledge: Small indeterminate deep soft tissue masses can safely be treated with primary excision in the setting of a specialist musculoskeletal oncology service.

References
1.
Del Grande F, Ahlawat S, Subhawong T, Fayad L . Characterization of indeterminate soft tissue masses referred for biopsy: What is the added value of contrast imaging at 3.0 tesla?. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 45(2):390-400. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25361. View

2.
Kim S, Chung H . Small Musculoskeletal Soft-Tissue Lesions: US-guided Core Needle Biopsy--Comparative Study of Diagnostic Yields according to Lesion Size. Radiology. 2015; 278(1):156-63. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015142516. View

3.
Bates T, Kao E, Alderete J, Lybeck D . Synovial Sarcoma: A Series of Small Tumors in Active Duty Service Members. Mil Med. 2020; 185(9-10):e1864-e1868. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usaa048. View

4.
Lee J, Yoon Y, Jin W, Cha J, Kim S . Development and Validation of Nomograms for Malignancy Prediction in Soft Tissue Tumors Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):4897. PMC: 6427044. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41230-0. View

5.
Crundwell N, ODonnell P, Saifuddin A . Non-neoplastic conditions presenting as soft-tissue tumours. Clin Radiol. 2006; 62(1):18-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.08.007. View