The Zone of Latent Solutions and Its Relevance to Understanding Ape Cultures
Overview
Affiliations
The zone of latent solutions (ZLS) hypothesis provides an alternative approach to explaining cultural patterns in primates and many other animals. According to the ZLS hypothesis, non-human great ape (henceforth: ape) cultures consist largely or solely of latent solutions. The current competing (and predominant) hypothesis for ape culture argues instead that at least some of their behavioural or artefact forms are copied through specific social learning mechanisms ("copying social learning hypothesis") and that their forms may depend on copying (copying-dependent forms). In contrast, the ape ZLS hypothesis does not require these forms to be copied. Instead, it suggests that several (non-form-copying) social learning mechanisms help determine the frequency (but typically not the form) of these behaviours and artefacts within connected individuals. The ZLS hypothesis thus suggests that increases and stabilisations of a particular behaviour's or artefact's frequency can derive from socially-mediated (cued) form reinnovations. Therefore, and while genes and ecology play important roles as well, according to the ape ZLS hypothesis, apes typically acquire the forms of their behaviours and artefacts individually, but are usually socially induced to do so (provided sufficient opportunity, necessity, motivation and timing). The ZLS approach is often criticized-perhaps also because it challenges the current null hypothesis, which instead assumes a requirement of form-copying social learning mechanisms to explain many ape behavioural (and/or artefact) forms. However, as the ZLS hypothesis is a new approach, with less accumulated literature compared to the current null hypothesis, some confusion is to be expected. Here, we clarify the ZLS approach-also in relation to other competing hypotheses-and address misconceptions and objections. We believe that these clarifications will provide researchers with a coherent theoretical approach and an experimental methodology to examine the necessity of form-copying variants of social learning in apes, humans and other species.
Piao Y, Brooks J, Yamamoto S Anim Cogn. 2025; 28(1):12.
PMID: 39932520 PMC: 11814020. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-025-01934-5.
Group-level signatures in bonobo sociality.
van Leeuwen E, Staes N, Eens M, Stevens J Evol Hum Sci. 2024; 6:e48.
PMID: 39712879 PMC: 11660378. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2024.44.
Human culture is uniquely open-ended rather than uniquely cumulative.
Morgan T, Feldman M Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 9(1):28-42.
PMID: 39511345 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-02035-y.
The origin of great ape gestural forms.
Graham K, Rossano F, Moore R Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(1):190-204.
PMID: 39192562 PMC: 11718593. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13136.
Cultural evolution: A review of theoretical challenges.
Nichols R, Charbonneau M, Chellappoo A, Davis T, Haidle M, Kimbrough E Evol Hum Sci. 2024; 6:e12.
PMID: 38516368 PMC: 10955367. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2024.2.