» Articles » PMID: 33089586

Risk-adapted Biopsy Decision Based on Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Enhanced Biopsy Avoidance in First Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Evaluation

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2020 Oct 22
PMID 33089586
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles

Optimal PSA density threshold for prostate biopsy in benign prostatic obstruction patients with elevated PSA levels but negative MRI findings.

Peng Y, Wei C, Li Y, Zhao F, Liu Y, Jiang T BMC Urol. 2025; 25(1):42.

PMID: 40033313 PMC: 11874838. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-025-01719-5.


Patients with multiple mpMRI region of interests: should we omit targeted biopsies of secondary lesions?.

Qin F, Yuan C, Ma J, Li H, Zhang J, Liu Y Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .

PMID: 39992404 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-04854-7.


Integrating radiological and clinical data for clinically significant prostate cancer detection with machine learning techniques.

Esteban L, Borque-Fernando A, Escorihuela M, Esteban-Escano J, Abascal J, Servian P Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4261.

PMID: 39905119 PMC: 11794621. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88297-6.


Can lesion volume and prostate-specific antigen density play a role in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System-3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging?.

Agrawal S, Prasad V, Menon A, Pooleri G Indian J Urol. 2025; 41(1):35-39.

PMID: 39886626 PMC: 11778701. DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_112_24.


Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps.

Bratt O, Auvinen A, Arnsrud Godtman R, Hellstrom M, Hugosson J, Lilja H BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000039.

PMID: 39886507 PMC: 11203092. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000039.


References
1.
van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israel B, Hendriks R, Padhani A, Hoogenboom M . Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large.... Eur Urol. 2018; 75(4):570-578. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. View

2.
Schoots I, Padhani A . Personalizing prostate cancer diagnosis with multivariate risk prediction tools: how should prostate MRI be incorporated?. World J Urol. 2019; 38(3):531-545. PMC: 7064475. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02899-0. View

3.
Hansen N, Barrett T, Kesch C, Pepdjonovic L, Bonekamp D, OSullivan R . Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2017; 122(1):40-49. DOI: 10.1111/bju.14049. View

4.
Padhani A, Barentsz J, Villeirs G, Rosenkrantz A, Margolis D, Turkbey B . PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway. Radiology. 2019; 292(2):464-474. PMC: 6677282. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182946. View

5.
Drost F, Osses D, Nieboer D, Steyerberg E, Bangma C, Roobol M . Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 4:CD012663. PMC: 6483565. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2. View