Peng Y, Wei C, Li Y, Zhao F, Liu Y, Jiang T
BMC Urol. 2025; 25(1):42.
PMID: 40033313
PMC: 11874838.
DOI: 10.1186/s12894-025-01719-5.
Qin F, Yuan C, Ma J, Li H, Zhang J, Liu Y
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025; .
PMID: 39992404
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-025-04854-7.
Esteban L, Borque-Fernando A, Escorihuela M, Esteban-Escano J, Abascal J, Servian P
Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4261.
PMID: 39905119
PMC: 11794621.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88297-6.
Agrawal S, Prasad V, Menon A, Pooleri G
Indian J Urol. 2025; 41(1):35-39.
PMID: 39886626
PMC: 11778701.
DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_112_24.
Bratt O, Auvinen A, Arnsrud Godtman R, Hellstrom M, Hugosson J, Lilja H
BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000039.
PMID: 39886507
PMC: 11203092.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000039.
Development and validation of risk-stratified biopsy decision pathways incorporating MRI and PSA-derived indicators.
Jin P, Wang X, Ding Z, Yang L, Xu C, Wang X
Ann Med. 2025; 57(1):2446695.
PMID: 39742889
PMC: 11703325.
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2446695.
Visibility of mpMRI region of interest on ultrasound during cognitive fusion targeted biopsy predicts prostate cancer detection: a prospective single-center study.
Qin F, Liu Z, Ma J, Wu J, Shen Q, Liu Y
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; .
PMID: 39710761
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04750-6.
Refining the need for prostate biopsy and the evolving role of MRI.
Padhani A, Woo S
Eur Radiol. 2024; .
PMID: 39702638
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11322-1.
Challenges in magnetic resonance imaging-based detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in young patients: two alternative approaches.
Huang T, Shi R, Shang J, Zhao R, Wang Y, Xia W
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):9419-9430.
PMID: 39698624
PMC: 11652039.
DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1017.
Oncological Safety of MRI-Informed Biopsy Decision-Making in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer.
Hamm C, Asbach P, Pohlmann A, Schoots I, Kasivisvanathan V, Henkel T
JAMA Oncol. 2024; 11(2):145-153.
PMID: 39666360
PMC: 11843366.
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5497.
Assessing the performance of ChatGPT and Bard/Gemini against radiologists for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System classification based on prostate multiparametric MRI text reports.
Lee K, Kessler D, Caglic I, Kuo Y, Shaida N, Barrett T
Br J Radiol. 2024; 98(1167):368-374.
PMID: 39535870
PMC: 11840166.
DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae236.
Utility of transperineal template-guided mapping prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Lee J, Lee C, Song W, Kang M, Sung H, Jeong B
Prostate Int. 2024; 12(3):134-138.
PMID: 39498351
PMC: 11531972.
DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.002.
Decade-long insights into transperineal prostate biopsy in a West China population: temporal trend, targeted and repeat biopsies, and pathological characterization: a comparative study - retrospective cohort.
Zhao J, Cai D, Chen Y, Dai J, Tu X, Chen J
Int J Surg. 2024; 111(1):1636-1641.
PMID: 39453842
PMC: 11745631.
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002122.
Using a novel PSMA-PET and PSA-based model to enhance the diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary biopsy in men with PI-RADS ≤ 3 MRI.
Li Y, Li J, Yang J, Xiao L, Zhou M, Cai Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 52(3):913-924.
PMID: 39404788
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06949-7.
Stockholm3 in a Multiethnic Cohort: Optimizing Prostate Cancer Screening to Reduce Harm and Improve Equity.
Brooks J
J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(32):3768-3772.
PMID: 39361913
PMC: 11540720.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00941.
Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy Alone for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Selected Biopsy-Naïve Patients: Results from a Retrospective Pilot Study.
Olivetta M, Manfredi C, Spirito L, Quattrone C, Bottone F, Stizzo M
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(15).
PMID: 39125520
PMC: 11311372.
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14151643.
Precision in prostate cancer detection: integrating prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) to provide additional risk stratification for a more accurate diagnostic decision.
Hruba T, Kubas V, Franko M, Balaz V, Spurny M, Mistinova J
Ir J Med Sci. 2024; 193(6):2635-2642.
PMID: 39093531
PMC: 11666638.
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-024-03771-w.
Advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging combined with biomarkers for the diagnosis of high-grade prostate cancer.
Li S, Zha M, Wang Q, Tang Y
Front Surg. 2024; 11:1429831.
PMID: 39081487
PMC: 11286397.
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1429831.
Refining clinically relevant cut-offs of prostate specific antigen density for risk stratification in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions.
Mjaess G, Haddad L, Jabbour T, Baudewyns A, Bourgeno H, Lefebvre Y
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024; 28(1):173-179.
PMID: 39048664
DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00872-6.
Repeat Prostate-specific Antigen Testing Improves Risk-based Selection of Men for Prostate Biopsy After Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Davik P, Elschot M, Bathen T, Bertilsson H
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 65:21-28.
PMID: 38974460
PMC: 11225807.
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.05.011.