» Articles » PMID: 33087750

Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Moderate Effects of Post-learning Activity on Memory Consolidation over the Long Term

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Oct 22
PMID 33087750
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Similar to sleeping after learning, a brief period of wakeful resting after encoding new information supports memory retention in contrast to task-related cognition. Recent evidence suggests that working memory capacity (WMC) is related to sleep-dependent declarative memory consolidation. We tested whether WMC moderates the effect of a brief period of wakeful resting compared to performing a distractor task subsequent to encoding a word list. Participants encoded and immediately recalled a word list followed by either an 8 min wakeful resting period (eyes closed, relaxed) or by performing an adapted version of the d2 test of attention for 8 min. At the end of the experimental session (after 12-24 min) and again, after 7 days, participants were required to complete a surprise free recall test of both word lists. Our results show that interindividual differences in WMC are a central moderating factor for the effect of post-learning activity on memory retention. The difference in word retention between a brief period of wakeful resting versus performing a selective attention task subsequent to encoding increased in higher WMC individuals over a retention interval of 12-24 min, as well as over 7 days. This effect was reversed in lower WMC individuals. Our results extend findings showing that WMC seems not only to moderate sleep-related but also wakeful resting-related memory consolidation.

Citing Articles

Waking rest during retention facilitates memory consolidation, but so does social media use.

Quevedo Putter J, Erdfelder E Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5884.

PMID: 39966578 PMC: 11836141. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88363-z.


Post-encoding task engagement not attentional load is detrimental to awake consolidation.

Craig M, Greer J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3025.

PMID: 38321066 PMC: 10847105. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53393-6.


Individual differences in sensory processing sensitivity amplify effects of post-learning activity for better and for worse.

Marhenke R, Acevedo B, Sachse P, Martini M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4451.

PMID: 36932138 PMC: 10023813. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31192-9.


Wakeful Rest Benefits Recall, but Not Recognition, of Incidentally Encoded Memory Stimuli in Younger and Older Adults.

Millar P, Balota D Brain Sci. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36552069 PMC: 9775546. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121609.

References
1.
Conway A, Kane M, Engle R . Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(12):547-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005. View

2.
Schon K, Hasselmo M, LoPresti M, Tricarico M, Stern C . Persistence of parahippocampal representation in the absence of stimulus input enhances long-term encoding: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of subsequent memory after a delayed match-to-sample task. J Neurosci. 2004; 24(49):11088-97. PMC: 6730271. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3807-04.2004. View

3.
Schneider B, Avivi-Reich M, Mozuraitis M . A cautionary note on the use of the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) in classification designs with and without within-subject factors. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:474. PMC: 4404726. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00474. View

4.
Unsworth N . Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007; 33(6):1020-34. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1020. View

5.
Cowan N . Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychol Bull. 1988; 104(2):163-91. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163. View