» Articles » PMID: 33087370

Patients' Perceptions of Safety in Emergency Medical Services: an Interview Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Oct 22
PMID 33087370
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Research on patient safety in emergency medical services (EMS) has mainly focused on the organisation's and/or the EMS personnel's perspective. Little is known about how patients perceive safety in EMS. This study aims to describe the patients' experiences of their sense of safety in EMS.

Methods: A qualitative design with individual interviews of EMS patients (n=21) and an inductive qualitative content analysis were used.

Results: Patients' experiences of EMS personnel's ability or inability to show or use their medical, technical and driving skills affected the patients' sense of safety. When they perceived a lack of professionalism and knowledge among EMS personnel, they felt unsafe. Patients highlighted equality in the encounter, the quality of the information given by EMS personnel and the opportunity to participate in their care as important factors creating a sense of safety during the EMS encounter. Altogether, patients' perceptions of safety in EMS were connected to their confidence in the EMS personnel.

Conclusions: Overall, patients felt safe during their EMS encounter, but the EMS personnel's professional competence alone is not enough for them to feel safe. Lack of communication or professionalism may compromise their sense of safety. Further work is needed to explore how patients' perceptions of safety can be used in improving safety in EMS.

Citing Articles

Root causes behind patient safety incidents in the emergency department and suggestions for improving patient safety - an analysis in a Finnish teaching hospital.

Halinen M, Tiirinki H, Rauhala A, Kiili S, Ikonen T BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1):209.

PMID: 39506678 PMC: 11542263. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-024-01120-9.


Finnish emergency medical services managers' and medical directors' perceptions of collaborating with patients concerning patient safety issues: a qualitative study.

Venesoja A, Tella S, Castren M, Lindstrom V BMJ Open. 2023; 13(4):e067754.

PMID: 37037618 PMC: 10111928. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067754.


Prehospital nursing students' experiences of patient safety culture in emergency medical services-A qualitative study.

Venesoja A, Lindstrom V, Castren M, Tella S J Clin Nurs. 2022; 32(5-6):847-858.

PMID: 35672936 PMC: 10083998. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16396.


Driving the ambulance: an essential component of emergency medical services: an integrative review.

Becker J, Hugelius K BMC Emerg Med. 2021; 21(1):160.

PMID: 34922453 PMC: 8684175. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-021-00554-9.

References
1.
Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

2.
Bishop A, Macdonald M . Patient Involvement in Patient Safety: A Qualitative Study of Nursing Staff and Patient Perceptions. J Patient Saf. 2014; 13(2):82-87. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000123. View

3.
Ahlenius M, Lindstrom V, Vicente V . Patients' experience of being badly treated in the ambulance service: A qualitative study of deviation reports in Sweden. Int Emerg Nurs. 2016; 30:25-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2016.07.004. View

4.
Bell S, Roche S, Mueller A, Dente E, OReilly K, Sarnoff Lee B . Speaking up about care concerns in the ICU: patient and family experiences, attitudes and perceived barriers. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018; 27(11):928-936. PMC: 6225795. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007525. View

5.
Reiman T, Pietikainen E, Oedewald P . Multilayered approach to patient safety culture. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19(5):e20. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.029793. View