Standardized Protocol Items Recommendations for Observational Studies (SPIROS) for Observational Study Protocol Reporting Guidelines: Protocol for a Delphi Study

Overview

Journal JMIR Res Protoc

Publisher JMIR Publications

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2020 Oct 21

PMID 33084592

Citations 11

Authors

Raman Mahajan

Sakib Burza

Lex M Bouter

Klaas Sijtsma

Andre Knottnerus

Jos Kleijnen

Peter Van Dael

Maurice P Zeegers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Approximately 90% of currently published clinical and public health research is in the form of observational studies. Having a detailed and registered study protocol prior to data collection is important in any empirical study. Without this, there is no reliable way to assess the occurrence of publication bias, outcome reporting bias, and other protocol deviations. However, there is currently no solid guidance available on the information that a protocol for an observational study should contain.

Objective: The aim of this study is to formulate the Standardized Protocol Items Recommendations for Observational Studies (SPIROS) reporting guidelines, which focus on 3 main study designs of analytical epidemiology: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies.

Methods: A scoping review of published protocol papers of observational studies in epidemiology will identify candidate items for the SPIROS reporting guidelines. The list of items will be extended with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist items and recommendations from the SPIROS steering committee. This long list serves as the basis for a 2-round Delphi survey among experts to obtain consensus on which items to include. Each candidate item from the long list will be rated on a 5-point Likert scale to assess relevance for inclusion in the SPIROS reporting guidelines. Following the Delphi survey, an expert-driven consensus workshop will be convened to finalize the reporting guidelines.

Results: A scoping review of published observational study protocols has been completed, with 59 candidate items identified for inclusion into the Delphi survey, itself launched in early 2020.

Conclusions: This project aims to improve the timeliness, completeness, and clarity of study protocols of observational studies in analytical epidemiology by producing expert-based recommendations of items to be addressed. These reporting guidelines will facilitate and encourage researchers to prepare and register study protocols of sufficient quality prior to data collection in order to improve the transparency, reproducibility, and quality of observational studies.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): PRR1-10.2196/17864.

Citing Articles

Pregnancy Outcomes in Living Kidney Donors: Protocol of a Population-Based Cohort Study in Three Canadian Provinces.

Wang C, Naylor K, McArthur E, Sontrop J, Roshanov P, Lam N Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2024; 11:20543581241284030.

PMID: 39381072 PMC: 11459540. DOI: 10.1177/20543581241284030.

Road to Recovery: protocol for a mixed-methods prospective cohort study evaluating the impact of a new model of substance use care in a Canadian setting.

Dennis B, Bowles J, Johnson C, De Wolfe T, Mundel E, Fast D BMJ Open. 2024; 14(9):e090608.

PMID: 39289021 PMC: 11409341. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090608.

A biobehavioral observational study to understand the multilevel determinants of cardiovascular health in Black women: the BLOOM Study protocol.

Liao Y, Brothers R, Brown K, Lee R BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):391.

PMID: 38970037 PMC: 11225161. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03182-0.

Community perspective and healthcare assessment in malaria endemic states of India: a cross-sectional study protocol.

B M S, H C V, Singhal R, Singh K, N S, Tripathi P BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e081856.

PMID: 38964800 PMC: 11227780. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081856.

Recognizing Statistical Problems in Reports of Clinical Trials: a Readers' Aid. Part 33 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications.

Suling A, Grosshennig A Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024; 121(19):634-638.

PMID: 38932519 PMC: 11741548. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0113.

References

Williams R, Tse T, Harlan W, Zarin D . Registration of observational studies: is it time?. CMAJ. 2010; 182(15):1638-42. PMC: 2952011. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.092252. View

Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Dickersin K, Moher D . SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols. Lancet. 2013; 381(9861):91-2. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62160-6. View

Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E . Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018; 18(1):143. PMC: 6245623. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x. View

Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, OBrien K, Colquhoun H, Levac D . PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7):467-473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850. View

Munafo M, Nosek B, Bishop D, Button K, Chambers C, Percie du Sert N . A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 1:0021. PMC: 7610724. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021. View

Tetzlaff J, Chan A, Kitchen J, Sampson M, Tricco A, Moher D . Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2012; 1:43. PMC: 3533811. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-43. View

Dal-Re R, Ioannidis J, Bracken M, Buffler P, Chan A, Franco E . Making prospective registration of observational research a reality. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6(224):224cm1. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007513. View

Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A, Ferrie J, Batty G . Post hoc decision-making in observational epidemiology--is there need for better research standards?. Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 42(2):367-70. PMC: 3619956. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt036. View

Teixeira P . p-Hacking - A call for ethics. Pulmonology. 2018; 24(3):207-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2018.03.001. View

10.

Bell S, Kivimaki M, Batty G . Subgroup analysis as a source of spurious findings: an illustration using new data on alcohol intake and coronary heart disease. Addiction. 2014; 110(1):183-4. PMC: 4273867. DOI: 10.1111/add.12708. View

11.

Loder E, Groves T, MacAuley D . Registration of observational studies. BMJ. 2010; 340:c950. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c950. View

12.

Nosek B, Ebersole C, DeHaven A, Mellor D . The preregistration revolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(11):2600-2606. PMC: 5856500. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114. View

13.

Grimes D, Schulz K . Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet. 2002; 359(9302):248-52. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07451-2. View

14.

Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Laupacis A, Gotzsche P, Krle A-Jeric K . SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016; 38(6):506-14. PMC: 5114122. View

15.

. Observational studies: getting clear about transparency. PLoS Med. 2014; 11(8):e1001711. PMC: 4144975. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001711. View

16.

Chavers S, Fife D, Wacholtz M, Stang P, Berlin J . Registration of Observational Studies: perspectives from an industry-based epidemiology group. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011; 20(10):1009-13. DOI: 10.1002/pds.2221. View

17.

Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H . Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000; 32(4):1008-15. View

18.

Chan A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Laupacis A, Gotzsche P, Krleza-Jeric K . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158(3):200-7. PMC: 5114123. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583. View

19.

Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, OBrien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M . A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016; 16:15. PMC: 4746911. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4. View

20.

Boccia S . Credibility of observational studies: why public health researchers should care?. Eur J Public Health. 2015; 25(4):554-5. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv119. View