» Articles » PMID: 3307992

Fascia Closure After Midline Laparotomy: Results of a Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal Br J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1987 Aug 1
PMID 3307992
Citations 51
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Four techniques to close the fascia after midline laparotomy were compared in a prospective randomized multicentre trial. The four techniques were: interrupted closure with polyglactin; continuous closure with polyglactin; continuous closure with polydioxanone-s, and continuous closure with nylon. The early postoperative results in 1491 patients revealed an incidence of wound infection of 8.6 per cent and of wound dehiscence of 2.3 per cent with no statistically significant differences between the four techniques. We reviewed 1156 patients after 1 year. Wound pain was present in 9.7 per cent of the patients, statistically significantly more in the group closed with nylon (16.7 per cent). Suture sinuses developed in 3.5 per cent of the patients, statistically significantly more frequently in the nylon group (7.7 per cent). The total number of incisional hernias detected 1 year postoperatively was high (15.2 per cent) (interrupted polyglactin 16.9 per cent, continuous polyglactin 20.6 per cent, continuous polydioxanone 13.2 per cent and continuous nylon 10.3 per cent). The difference between nylon and continuous polyglactin is statistically significant. The results of this trial indicate that although nylon has the lowest incidence of incisional hernia it also is associated with more wound pain and suture sinuses.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic or Robotically Assisted Colectomy with a Pfannenstiel Incision Reduces the Incisional Hernia Incidence.

Natsume S, Yamaguchi T, Nakano D, Takao M, Kato H, Ise I J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024; 8(4):298-304.

PMID: 39473708 PMC: 11513423. DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2024-019.


Continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy: CONTINT: a randomized controlled trial [NCT00544583].

Polychronidis G, Rahbari N, Bruckner T, Sander A, Sommer F, Usta S World J Emerg Surg. 2023; 18(1):51.

PMID: 37848901 PMC: 10583371. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00517-4.


Don't fear the (small) bite: A narrative review of the rationale and misconceptions surrounding closure of abdominal wall incisions.

Theodorou A, Banysch M, Gok H, Deerenberg E, Kalff J, von Websky M Front Surg. 2022; 9:1002558.

PMID: 36504582 PMC: 9727106. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1002558.


A Pilot and Feasibility Study to Evaluate Small and Large Bite Fascial Closure Techniques.

Gates C, Berg G, Vincent K, Acuna D, Ali K Kans J Med. 2021; 14:163-169.

PMID: 34262636 PMC: 8274812. DOI: 10.17161/kjm.vol1415236.


The Japan Society for Surgical Infection: guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infection, 2018.

Ohge H, Mayumi T, Haji S, Kitagawa Y, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi M Surg Today. 2020; 51(1):1-31.

PMID: 33320283 PMC: 7788056. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02181-6.