» Articles » PMID: 33078671

Intimate Partner Violence Experienced by Physicians

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Health Services
Date 2020 Oct 20
PMID 33078671
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: World Health Organization (WHO) defines intimate partner violence (IPV) as physical, sexual or psychological harm caused by an intimate partner or ex-partner. There are few studies describing interpersonal violence (IPV) among physicians. Our study describes IPV experienced by U.S. physicians.

Methods: This was a multicenter survey administered to 4 physician groups in 2015 to 2016. In total 400 respondents returned survey results. Measures included current IPV, childhood abuse, mental health, professional role, and demographics.

Results: IPV was reported by 24% of respondents. The most frequent abuses reported were: verbal (15%), physical (8%) followed by sexual abuse (4%) and stalking (4%). Logistic regression model found that IPV was more likely to be reported by older participants (aged 66-89), those who experienced childhood abuse, working less than full time, and had been diagnosed with a personality disorder. Women and Asian Americans reported slightly higher IPV rates.

Conclusions: Our study has implications for both medical education and intervention development. Universal screening and education that addresses clinical implications when treating peers who experience IPV are needed. Workplace interventions that consider unique physician characteristics and experiences are needed, as well as programs that support sustained recovery. This is the first survey to our knowledge that confirms that physicians experience IPV at a rate consistent or higher than the national level. We developed a standardized instrument to assess IPV in male and female physicians at various career stages. We also identified significant predictors that should be included in IPV screening of potential physician victims.

Citing Articles

Physicians' experiences with reporting domestic violence against women: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.

AlMuammar S, Alhowig W Int J Emerg Med. 2024; 17(1):58.

PMID: 38658843 PMC: 11040842. DOI: 10.1186/s12245-024-00635-z.


He hit me; but it's okay! Female submissiveness in marital abuse: A review in Indian context.

Kumar L, Stephen J, George R, Babu L J Family Med Prim Care. 2022; 11(2):447-452.

PMID: 35360768 PMC: 8963638. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1870_21.


Healthcare Professionals' Own Experiences of Domestic Violence and Abuse: A Meta-Analysis of Prevalence and Systematic Review of Risk Markers and Consequences.

Dheensa S, McLindon E, Spencer C, Pereira S, Shrestha S, Emsley E Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022; 24(3):1282-1299.

PMID: 34978481 PMC: 10240650. DOI: 10.1177/15248380211061771.

References
1.
Ernst A, Weiss S, Del Castillo C, Aagaard J, Marvez-Valls E, DAngelo J . Witnessing intimate partner violence as a child does not increase the likelihood of becoming an adult intimate partner violence victim. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14(5):411-8. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.032. View

2.
McLindon E, Humphreys C, Hegarty K . "It happens to clinicians too": an Australian prevalence study of intimate partner and family violence against health professionals. BMC Womens Health. 2018; 18(1):113. PMC: 6020247. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0588-y. View

3.
Peterson C, Kearns M, McIntosh W, Estefan L, Nicolaidis C, McCollister K . Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults. Am J Prev Med. 2018; 55(4):433-444. PMC: 6161830. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049. View

4.
Brown C . Physicians not immune to intimate partner violence. CMAJ. 2018; 190(46):E1372-E1373. PMC: 6239916. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5667. View

5.
Candib L, Savageau J, Weinreb L, Reed G . Inquiring into our past: when the doctor is a survivor of abuse. Fam Med. 2012; 44(6):416-24. View