» Articles » PMID: 3307654

Blood Flow in Colonic Anastomoses. Effect of Stapling and Suturing

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1987 Sep 1
PMID 3307654
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sutureline blood flow was measured with laser Doppler velocimetry in colonic anastomoses created with the stapler, manual suturing, or a combination. Blood flow was always reduced in the sutureline compared with normal mucosa. Of all the anastomoses studied, tight stapling reduced sutureline blood flow the most, whereas the two-layered manual anastomosis or stapling reinforced with sutures were somewhat less ischemic. Stapling adjusted to bowel wall thickness impaired flow only moderately. It was possible with practice to outperform the stapler by single-layered manual anastomosis using fine sutures. In humans, stapled ileocolostomy had a higher sutureline blood flow than the two-layered manual anastomosis. In view of the existing clinical experience of safe stapling without adjustment for bowel wall thickness, a low sutureline blood flow is probably tolerated to a considerable degree in humans. However, this study clearly shows that tight stapling can reduce sutureline blood flow unduly, whereas superior blood supply can be attained by attention to staple closure height relative to bowel wall thickness.

Citing Articles

Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.

Catarci M, Guadagni S, Masedu F, Ruffo G, Viola M, Borghi F Int J Surg. 2023; 109(8):2312-2323.

PMID: 37195782 PMC: 10442086. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000480.


Pectin based biologic Velcro effectively seals traumatic solid organ and small bowel injuries.

Williams J, Prey B, Francis A, Weykamp M, Liu B, Parsons M J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023; 95(1):55-61.

PMID: 36872522 PMC: 11583053. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003910.


The Colorectal Anastomosis: A Timeless Challenge.

Gaidarski Iii A, Ferrara M Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023; 36(1):11-28.

PMID: 36619283 PMC: 9815911. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756510.


Comparison of pressure resistance of double-rows and triple-rows circular stapler in rectal double stapling technique: In vitro study.

Mazaki J, Katsumata K, Udo R, Tago T, Kasahara K, Kuwabara H Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(28):e29600.

PMID: 35839009 PMC: 11132375. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029600.


Compression automation of circular stapler for preventing compression injury on gastrointestinal anastomosis.

Kim J, Park S, Kim N, Lee I, Jung H, Ahn H Int J Med Robot. 2022; 18(3):e2374.

PMID: 35106896 PMC: 9285555. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2374.


References
1.
Marston A . Diagnosis and management of intestinal ischaemia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1972; 50(1):29-44. PMC: 2388053. View

2.
Brolin R, RAVITCH M . Studies in intestinal healing VI. Effect of pharmacologically induced peristalsis on fresh intestinal anastomoses in dogs. Arch Surg. 1980; 115(3):339-43. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380030083020. View

3.
Bubrick M . Effect of technique on anastomotic dehiscence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1981; 24(4):232-3. DOI: 10.1007/BF02641865. View

4.
Polglase A, Hughes E, McDermott F, Pihl E, Burke F . A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981; 152(6):792-6. View

5.
RAVITCH M, Brolin R, Kolter J, Yap S . Studies in the healing of intestinal anastomoses. World J Surg. 1981; 5(4):627-37. DOI: 10.1007/BF01655019. View