Different Impacts of COVID-19-related Information Sources on Public Worry: An Online Survey Through Social Media

Overview

Journal Internet Interv

Date 2020 Oct 19

PMID 33072524

Citations 29

Authors

Hsing-Ying Ho

Yi-Lung Chen

Cheng-Fang Yen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic spread rapidly, as did COVID-19-related information on diverse media platforms. Excessive COVID-19-related information caused substantial mental distress among the public. Although most studies focused on the impact of information on individuals during the pandemic, they usually focused on information from internet sources, and few studies compared the impacts between different information sources. We examine the sociodemographic profiles of participants receiving different information sources and the impact of various COVID-19-related information sources on public worry.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey with a total of 2007 participants aged 20 years and above recruited anonymously was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. The sociodemographic data, frequencies at which participants received COVID-19-related information, the information sources (e.g., traditional media, interpersonal information exchange, and academic courses), and the levels of past, current, and anticipated worry about COVID-19 were assessed.

Results: The most common sources of COVID-19-related information were internet media (80.52%), traditional media (52.62%), family members (24.36%), coworkers (23.57%), friends (21.08%), academic courses (20.18%), and medical staff (19.03%). We found that the COVID-19-related information from traditional media, internet media, and friends was associated with higher current worry (the unstandardized regression coefficient, B, ranged from 0.27 to 0.30), and the information from friends was associated with higher past worry (B was 0.18). In contrast, participants who received information from academic courses had lower past worry and anticipated worry (B ranged from -0.15 to -0.17).

Conclusions: Academic courses may play a protective role in public worry during the pandemic. Therefore, academic courses and the information they provide may help facilitate public education and reduce public worry in cases of infectious disease outbreaks.

Citing Articles

A Model of Trust in Online COVID-19 Information and Advice: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Sillence E, Branley-Bell D, Moss M, Briggs P JMIR Infodemiology. 2025; 5:e59317.

PMID: 39946705 PMC: 11888072. DOI: 10.2196/59317.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Adult Residents of Riyadh Regarding Sunstrokes.

Alfrayan F, Alkathiri M, Fakeeha B, Alfaifi A, Alkahtani Y, Alkhayatt A Cureus. 2024; 16(12):e75306.

PMID: 39660228 PMC: 11628200. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75306.

Narratives about distributed health literacy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Silva S, Machado H, Galasso I, Zimmermann B, Botrugno C Health (London). 2023; 29(1):100-117.

PMID: 38095184 PMC: 11660513. DOI: 10.1177/13634593231215715.

Knowledge and practices surrounding outbreaks and COVID-19 among community health workers in rural Rwanda: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study.

Niyigena A, Nyirahabimana N, Cubaka V, Mukandayisenga V, Ngizwenayo E, Niyigena P Pan Afr Med J. 2023; 45:35.

PMID: 37545611 PMC: 10403765. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.35.37020.

A study of COVID-19 vaccination in the US and Asia: The role of media, personal experiences, and risk perceptions.

Akel K, Noppert G, Rajamoorthy Y, Lu Y, Singh A, Harapan H PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023; 2(7):e0000734.

PMID: 36962371 PMC: 10021344. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000734.

References

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A . Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):1149-60. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. View

Frandsen M, Thow M, Ferguson S . The Effectiveness Of Social Media (Facebook) Compared With More Traditional Advertising Methods for Recruiting Eligible Participants To Health Research Studies: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016; 5(3):e161. PMC: 4997003. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.5747. View

Sell T, Hosangadi D, Trotochaud M . Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1):550. PMC: 7202904. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3. View

Li H, Bailey A, Huynh D, Chan J . YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?. BMJ Glob Health. 2020; 5(5). PMC: 7228483. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604. View

Basch C, Mohlman J, Hillyer G, Garcia P . Public Health Communication in Time of Crisis: Readability of On-Line COVID-19 Information. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020; 14(5):635-637. PMC: 7235310. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.151. View

Yao H . The more exposure to media information about COVID-19, the more distressed you will feel. Brain Behav Immun. 2020; 87:167-169. PMC: 7215146. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.031. View

Huang Y, Zhao N . Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in China: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 288:112954. PMC: 7152913. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112954. View

Ahmad A, Murad H . The Impact of Social Media on Panic During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iraqi Kurdistan: Online Questionnaire Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(5):e19556. PMC: 7238863. DOI: 10.2196/19556. View

Trefflich F, Kalckreuth S, Mergl R, Rummel-Kluge C . Psychiatric patients' internet use corresponds to the internet use of the general public. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 226(1):136-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.037. View

10.

Schol L, Mollers M, Swaan C, Beaujean D, Wong A, Timen A . Knowledge, perceptions and media use of the Dutch general public and healthcare workers regarding Ebola, 2014. BMC Infect Dis. 2018; 18(1):18. PMC: 5759181. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2906-7. View

11.

DSouza R, Dsouza S, Strand N, Anderson A, Vogt M, Olatoye O . YouTube as a source of medical information on the novel coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Glob Public Health. 2020; 15(7):935-942. DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1761426. View

12.

Savas E, Tanriverdi D . Knowledge, attitudes and anxiety towards influenza A/H1N1 vaccination of healthcare workers in Turkey. BMC Infect Dis. 2010; 10:281. PMC: 3161359. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-281. View

13.

Nelson L, Simard J, Oluyomi A, Nava V, Rosas L, Bondy M . US Public Concerns About the COVID-19 Pandemic From Results of a Survey Given via Social Media. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180(7):1020-1022. PMC: 7139509. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1369. View

14.

Manierre M . Gaps in knowledge: tracking and explaining gender differences in health information seeking. Soc Sci Med. 2015; 128:151-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.028. View

15.

Li D, Ko N, Chen Y, Wang P, Chang Y, Yen C . Confidence in coping with COVID-19 and its related factors among the public in Taiwan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020; 74(11):608-610. PMC: 7436213. DOI: 10.1111/pcn.13128. View

16.

Springer S, Menzel L, Zieger M . Google Trends provides a tool to monitor population concerns and information needs during COVID-19 pandemic. Brain Behav Immun. 2020; 87:109-110. PMC: 7189190. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.073. View

17.

Ko N, Lu W, Chen Y, Li D, Wang P, Hsu S . COVID-19-related information sources and psychological well-being: An online survey study in Taiwan. Brain Behav Immun. 2020; 87:153-154. PMC: 7204755. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.019. View

18.

Bults M, Beaujean D, de Zwart O, Kok G, van Empelen P, van Steenbergen J . Perceived risk, anxiety, and behavioural responses of the general public during the early phase of the Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in the Netherlands: results of three consecutive online surveys. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:2. PMC: 3091536. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-2. View

19.

Chen E, Lerman K, Ferrara E . Tracking Social Media Discourse About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Public Coronavirus Twitter Data Set. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020; 6(2):e19273. PMC: 7265654. DOI: 10.2196/19273. View