Comparison of Immediate Implant Placement Following Extraction with and Without Socket-Shield Technique in Esthetic Region

Overview

Journal J Maxillofac Oral Surg

Date 2020 Oct 19

PMID 33071504

Citations 10

Authors

Shamita Tiwari

Ravinder Singh Bedi

Puneet Wadhwani

Jitender Kumar Aurora

Himanshu Chauhan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Immediate implant with socket shield and immediate implant without socket shield are the two techniques which can be used to preserve the already thin labial bone in the esthetic region, thus eliminating the need for graft materials.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of immediate implant placement after extraction without socket-shield technique and with socket-shield technique in the esthetic region.

Materials And Methods: Sixteen patients who reported with unsalvageable maxillary anterior teeth with labial bone thickness of less than 2 mm, depicted on preoperative CBCT, were chosen for the study and randomly assigned one of the two groups: Group A comprising socket-shield technique patients and Group B comprising immediate implant placement without socket shield. The labial bone thickness was analyzed along its entire length through CBCT scan at definite follow-up intervals up to a period of 12 months after the procedure.

Results: Follow-up of 1 year demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the labial bone thickness at the crest in Group B after 8th and 12th months of implant placement.

Conclusion: The two techniques need further comparison though our study results demonstrated better preservation of bone through the socket-shield technique, thus eliminating the need for any bony substitutes.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Timing of Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone with Type I Extraction Sockets- A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Santhanakrishnan M, Subramanian V, Arul D, Marimuthu S Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2024; 16:481-498.

PMID: 39664798 PMC: 11631776. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S489867.

Failure Rate of Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alzahrani M, Bakhreibah S, Alharbi N, Alamoudi L, Halloul S, Alamoudi S Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65506.

PMID: 39188493 PMC: 11346331. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65506.

Preserving Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Health: A Case Report on Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket Shield Technique.

Shanmugam M, Balaji A, Valiathan M, Kannan R, Jeyaraj Samuel A Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e57940.

PMID: 38738015 PMC: 11082481. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57940.

Application of orthodontics combined with porcelain laminate veneers in the aesthetic restoration and flora regulation of anterior teeth.

Na L, Hai B, Quan Y, Qiang Z Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(29):e34340.

PMID: 37478279 PMC: 10662840. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034340.

The socket shield technique and its complications, implant survival rate, and clinical outcomes: a systematic review.

Oliva S, Capogreco M, Murmura G, Lupi E, Mariachiara D, DAmario M J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022; 53(2):99-109.

PMID: 36468475 PMC: 10133821. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2201780089.

References

Gluckman H, Du Toit J, Salama M . The Pontic-Shield: Partial Extraction Therapy for Ridge Preservation and Pontic Site Development. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016; 36(3):417-23. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2651. View

Cho Y, Moon S, Chung C, Kim H . Resorption of labial bone in maxillary anterior implant. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3(2):85-9. PMC: 3141124. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.85. View

Miyamoto Y, Obama T . Dental cone beam computed tomography analyses of postoperative labial bone thickness in maxillary anterior implants: comparing immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011; 31(3):215-25. View

Spray J, Black C, Morris H, Ochi S . The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol. 2002; 5(1):119-28. DOI: 10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119. View

Carlsson G, Persson G . Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing of dentures. A longitudinal, clinical, and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years. Odontol Revy. 1967; 18(1):27-54. View

Siormpas K, Mitsias M, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, Garber D, Kotsakis G . Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone utilizing the "root-membrane" technique: clinical results up to 5 years postloading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29(6):1397-405. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3707. View

Chen S, Buser D . Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl:186-215. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3. View

Zhou Z, Chen W, Shen M, Sun C, Li J, Chen N . Cone beam computed tomographic analyses of alveolar bone anatomy at the maxillary anterior region in Chinese adults. J Biomed Res. 2014; 28(6):498-505. PMC: 4250963. DOI: 10.7555/JBR.27.20130002. View

Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk R, Parma-Benfenati S . A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006; 26(1):19-29. View

10.

Januario A, Duarte W, Barriviera M, Mesti J, Araujo M, Lindhe J . Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22(10):1168-1171. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02086.x. View

11.

Hammerle C, Araujo M, Simion M . Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 Suppl 5:80-2. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x. View

12.

Hurzeler M, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele S, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S . The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010; 37(9):855-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x. View

13.

Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Hurzeler M . Socket Shield Technique for immediate implant placement - clinical, radiographic and volumetric data after 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017; 28(11):1450-1458. DOI: 10.1111/clr.13012. View

14.

Gupta A, Rathee S, Agarwal J, Pachar R . Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017; 18(9):785-789. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2127. View

15.

Davarpanah M, Szmukler-Moncler S . Unconventional implant treatment: I. Implant placement in contact with ankylosed root fragments. A series of five case reports. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(8):851-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01653.x. View

16.

Pietrokovski J, MASSLER M . Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 17(1):21-7. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7. View

17.

Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G . Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33(1):93-102. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq034. View

18.

Evans C, Chen S . Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 19(1):73-80. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01413.x. View

19.

Shen J, He F, Jiang Q, Shan H . [Measurement of facial bone wall thickness of maxillary anterior teeth and premolars on cone beam computed tomography images]. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012; 41(3):234-8. View

20.

Huynh-Ba G, Pjetursson B, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Lindhe J . Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(1):37-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.x. View