Effects of Practice Variability on Second-Language Speech Production Training

Overview

Journal Folia Phoniatr Logop

Publisher Karger

Specialty Otorhinolaryngology

Date 2020 Oct 18

PMID 33070129

Authors

Lindsay Bu

Marisa Nagano

Daphna Harel

Tara McAllister

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Mastering the phonetics of a second language (L2) involves a component of speech-motor skill, and it has been suggested that L2 learners aiming to achieve a more native-like pronunciation could benefit from practice structured in accordance with the principles of motor learning.

Participants And Methods: This study investigated the influence one such principle, high versus low variability in practice, has on speech-motor learning for Korean adults seeking to acquire native-like production of English rhotics. Practice incorporated a commercially available intraoral placement device ("R Buddy," Speech Buddies Inc.). In a single-subject across-behaviors design, 8 participants were pseudorandomly assigned to practice rhotic targets in a low-variability (single word) or high-variability (multiple words) practice condition.

Results: The hypothesized advantage for high-variability over low-variability practice was observed in the short-term time frame. However, long-term learning was limited in nature for both conditions.

Conclusion: These results suggest that future research should incorporate high-variability practice while identifying additional manipulations to maximize the magnitude of long-term generalization learning.

References

McAllister Byun T, Campbell H . Differential Effects of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Speech Errors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:567. PMC: 5104733. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00567. View

Burris C, Vorperian H, Fourakis M, Kent R, Bolt D . Quantitative and descriptive comparison of four acoustic analysis systems: vowel measurements. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014; 57(1):26-45. PMC: 3972630. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0103). View

Harel D, McAllister T . Multilevel Models for Communication Sciences and Disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(4):783-801. DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0075. View

Maas E, Robin D, Austermann Hula S, Freedman S, Wulf G, Ballard K . Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008; 17(3):277-98. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025). View

Kim I, LaPointe L, Stierwalt J . The effect of feedback and practice on the acquisition of novel speech behaviors. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 21(2):89-100. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/09-0082). View

McAllister Byun T, Hitchcock E, Swartz M . Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014; 57(6):2116-30. PMC: 4294189. DOI: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034. View

Lively S, Logan J, Pisoni D . Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 94(3 Pt 1):1242-55. PMC: 3509365. DOI: 10.1121/1.408177. View

Skelton S . Concurrent task sequencing in single-phoneme phonologic treatment and generalization. J Commun Disord. 2004; 37(2):131-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.08.002. View

Edeal D, Gildersleeve-Neumann C . The importance of production frequency in therapy for childhood apraxia of speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011; 20(2):95-110. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2011/09-0005). View

10.

Logan J, Lively S, Pisoni D . Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991; 89(2):874-86. PMC: 3518834. DOI: 10.1121/1.1894649. View

11.

McGowan R, Nittrouer S, Manning C . Development of [j] in young, midwestern, American children. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 115(2):871-84. PMC: 3987658. DOI: 10.1121/1.1642624. View

12.

Maas E, Farinella K . Random versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011; 55(2):561-78. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0120). View

13.

Beeson P, Robey R . Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychol Rev. 2006; 16(4):161-9. PMC: 2366174. DOI: 10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7. View

14.

Campbell H, Harel D, Hitchcock E, McAllister Byun T . Selecting an acoustic correlate for automated measurement of American English rhotic production in children. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017; 20(6):635-643. PMC: 6050150. DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1359334. View

15.

Preston J, Brick N, Landi N . Ultrasound biofeedback treatment for persisting childhood apraxia of speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013; 22(4):627-43. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0139). View

16.

McAllister Byun T, Hitchcock E . Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 21(3):207-21. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0083). View

17.

Boyce S, Espy-Wilson C . Coarticulatory stability in American English /r/. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 101(6):3741-53. DOI: 10.1121/1.418333. View

18.

Preston J, Leece M, Maas E . Intensive Treatment with Ultrasound Visual Feedback for Speech Sound Errors in Childhood Apraxia. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:440. PMC: 5003919. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00440. View

19.

Bradlow A, Pisoni D, Tohkura Y . Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Percept Psychophys. 1999; 61(5):977-85. PMC: 3472521. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206911. View