» Articles » PMID: 33069847

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Vulnerable Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque

Abstract

Background: Acute coronary syndromes most commonly arise from thrombosis of lipid-rich coronary atheromas that have large plaque burden despite angiographically appearing mild.

Objectives: This study sought to examine the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques.

Methods: Three-vessel imaging was performed with a combination intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) catheter after successful PCI of all flow-limiting coronary lesions in 898 patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI). Patients with an angiographically nonobstructive stenosis not intended for PCI but with IVUS plaque burden of ≥65% were randomized to treatment of the lesion with a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) plus guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) versus GDMT alone. The primary powered effectiveness endpoint was the IVUS-derived minimum lumen area (MLA) at protocol-driven 25-month follow-up. The primary (nonpowered) safety endpoint was randomized target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 24 months. The secondary (nonpowered) clinical effectiveness endpoint was randomized lesion-related major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, MI, unstable angina, or progressive angina) at latest follow-up.

Results: A total of 182 patients were randomized (93 BVS, 89 GDMT alone) at 15 centers. The median angiographic diameter stenosis of the randomized lesions was 41.6%; by near-infrared spectroscopy-IVUS, the median plaque burden was 73.7%, the median MLA was 2.9 mm, and the median maximum lipid plaque content was 33.4%. Angiographic follow-up at 25 months was completed in 167 patients (91.8%), and the median clinical follow-up was 4.1 years. The follow-up MLA in BVS-treated lesions was 6.9 ± 2.6 mm compared with 3.0 ± 1.0 mm in GDMT alone-treated lesions (least square means difference: 3.9 mm; 95% confidence interval: 3.3 to 4.5; p < 0.0001). Target lesion failure at 24 months occurred in similar rates of BVS-treated and GDMT alone-treated patients (4.3% vs. 4.5%; p = 0.96). Randomized lesion-related major adverse cardiac events occurred in 4.3% of BVS-treated patients versus 10.7% of GDMT alone-treated patients (odds ratio: 0.38; 95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 1.28; p = 0.12).

Conclusions: PCI of angiographically mild lesions with large plaque burden was safe, substantially enlarged the follow-up MLA, and was associated with favorable long-term clinical outcomes, warranting the performance of an adequately powered randomized trial. (PROSPECT ABSORB [Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree II Combined with a Randomized, Controlled, Intervention Trial]; NCT02171065).

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Influence of Morphological Features on the Vulnerability of Lipid-Rich Plaques During Stenting.

Colmenarez J, Dong P, Lee J, Wilson D, Gu L J Biomech Eng. 2024; 147(2.

PMID: 39665787 PMC: 11748963. DOI: 10.1115/1.4067398.


Visualization of Vulnerable Coronary Plaque and Prevention of Plaque Rupture.

Fukase T, Dohi T Juntendo Iji Zasshi. 2024; 70(4):260-268.

PMID: 39431179 PMC: 11487368. DOI: 10.14789/jmj.JMJ24-0011-R.


Optical Coherence Tomography in Myocardial Infarction Management: Enhancing Precision in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Buonpane A, Trimarchi G, Ciardetti M, Coceani M, Alagna G, Benedetti G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39407851 PMC: 11477163. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195791.


Medically Treated Nonischemic Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma Lesions Versus Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization in Diabetic Patients.

Hommels T, Hermanides R, Fabris E, Malinowski K, Berta B, Roleder T J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024; 3(3Part A):101256.

PMID: 39131788 PMC: 11307495. DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101256.


Computed Tomography Angiography Identified High-Risk Coronary Plaques: From Diagnosis to Prognosis and Future Management.

Dimitriadis K, Pyrpyris N, Theofilis P, Mantzouranis E, Beneki E, Kostakis P Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39125547 PMC: 11311283. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14151671.