» Articles » PMID: 33067592

A Risk-stratified Approach to Colorectal Cancer Prevention and Diagnosis

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2020 Oct 17
PMID 33067592
Citations 56
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Population screening and endoscopic surveillance are used widely to prevent the development of and death from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, CRC remains a major cause of cancer mortality and the increasing burden of endoscopic investigations threatens to overwhelm some health services. This Perspective describes the rationale for and approach to improved risk stratification and decision-making for CRC prevention and diagnosis. Limitations of current approaches will be discussed using the UK as an example of the challenges faced by a particular health-care system, followed by discussion of novel risk biomarker utilization. We explore how risk stratification will be advantageous to current health-care providers and users, enabling more efficient use of limited colonoscopy resources. We discuss risk stratification in the setting of population screening as well as the surveillance of high-risk groups and investigation of symptomatic patients. We also address challenges in the development and validation of risk stratification tools and identify key research priorities.

Citing Articles

Advancements in Managing Choledocholithiasis and Acute Cholangitis in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Review.

Chen G, Sha Y, Wang K, Tang R, Zhai Z, Wang Z Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78492.

PMID: 40051943 PMC: 11884421. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78492.


Navigating the risks: Stakeholder views on risk-based cervical cancer screening.

Remmel M, Suija K, Markina A, Tisler A, kivite-Urtane A, Stankunas M PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0317986.

PMID: 40043044 PMC: 11882054. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317986.


A systems based qualitative analysis exploring the potential to implement risk stratified bowel cancer screening in England.

Moorthie S, Taylor L, Dennison R, Usher-Smith J BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):226.

PMID: 39930493 PMC: 11812230. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12381-w.


Assessing the rates of false-positive ovarian cancer screenings and surgical interventions associated with screening tools: a systematic review.

Silverwood S, Backer G, Galloway A, Reid K, Jeter A, Harrison M BMJ Oncol. 2025; 3(1):e000404.

PMID: 39886168 PMC: 11261692. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000404.


Public acceptability and anticipated uptake of risk-stratified bowel cancer screening in the UK: An online survey.

Taylor L, Dennison R, Usher-Smith J Prev Med Rep. 2024; 48:102927.

PMID: 39634284 PMC: 11614824. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102927.


References
1.
Cross A, Robbins E, Pack K, Stenson I, Kirby P, Patel B . Long-term colorectal cancer incidence after adenoma removal and the effects of surveillance on incidence: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study. Gut. 2020; 69(9):1645-1658. PMC: 7456728. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320036. View

2.
Markar S, Chin S, Romano A, Wiggins T, Antonowicz S, Paraskeva P . Breath Volatile Organic Compound Profiling of Colorectal Cancer Using Selected Ion Flow-tube Mass Spectrometry. Ann Surg. 2017; 269(5):903-910. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002539. View

3.
Cuzick J, Thorat M, Bosetti C, Brown P, Burn J, Cook N . Estimates of benefits and harms of prophylactic use of aspirin in the general population. Ann Oncol. 2014; 26(1):47-57. PMC: 4269341. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu225. View

4.
Weigl K, Chang-Claude J, Knebel P, Hsu L, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H . Strongly enhanced colorectal cancer risk stratification by combining family history and genetic risk score. Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 10:143-152. PMC: 5783152. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S145636. View

5.
Xin J, Chu H, Ben S, Ge Y, Shao W, Zhao Y . Evaluating the effect of multiple genetic risk score models on colorectal cancer risk prediction. Gene. 2018; 673:174-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.035. View