» Articles » PMID: 33066463

Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar () in the Carpathian Basin

Overview
Journal Genes (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Oct 17
PMID 33066463
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the Carpathian Basin the wild boar () belongs among the most important game species both ecologically and economically, therefore knowing more about the basics of the genetics of the species is a key factor for accurate and sustainable management of its population. The aim of this study was to estimate the genetic diversity and to elucidate the genetic structure and location of wild boar populations in the Carpathian Basin. A total of 486 samples were collected and genotyped using 13 STR markers. The number of alleles varied between 4 and 14, at 9 of the 13 loci the observed heterozygosity was significantly different ( < 0.05) from the expected value, showing remarkable introgression in the population. The population was separated into two groups, with an F value of 0.03, suggesting the presence of two subpopulations. The first group included 147 individuals from the north-eastern part of Hungary, whereas the second group included 339 samples collected west and south of the first group. The two subpopulations' genetic indices are roughly similar. The lack of physical barriers between the two groups indicates that the genetic difference is most likely caused by the high reproduction rate and large home range of the wild boars, or by some genetic traces' having been preserved from both the last ice age and the period before the Hungarian water regulation.

Citing Articles

Changes in the Genetic Structure of Lithuania's Wild Boar () Population Following the Outbreak of African Swine Fever.

Griciuviene L, Janeliunas Z, Pileviciene S, Jurgelevicius V, Paulauskas A Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(9).

PMID: 36140730 PMC: 9498859. DOI: 10.3390/genes13091561.


Genome-Wide Selection Sweep between Wild and Local Pigs from Europe for the Investigation of the Hereditary Characteristics of Domestication in Sus Scrofa.

Gong Y, Zhang H, Yuan Y, He Y, Zhang W, Han Y Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(8).

PMID: 35454283 PMC: 9030587. DOI: 10.3390/ani12081037.


Genetic Structure of the Root Vole Resistance of the Habitat Specialist to the Natural Fragmentation of Preferred Moist Habitats.

Lopucki R, Mroz I, Nowak-Zyczynska Z, Perlinska-Teresiak M, Owadowska-Cornil E, Klich D Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(3).

PMID: 35327989 PMC: 8954809. DOI: 10.3390/genes13030434.

References
1.
Schmitt T, Varga Z . Extra-Mediterranean refugia: The rule and not the exception?. Front Zool. 2012; 9(1):22. PMC: 3462695. DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-9-22. View

2.
Manni F, Guerard E, Heyer E . Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by using Monmonier's algorithm. Hum Biol. 2004; 76(2):173-90. DOI: 10.1353/hub.2004.0034. View

3.
Frantz A, Bertouille S, Eloy M, Licoppe A, Chaumont F, Flamand M . Comparative landscape genetic analyses show a Belgian motorway to be a gene flow barrier for red deer (Cervus elaphus), but not wild boars (Sus scrofa). Mol Ecol. 2012; 21(14):3445-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05623.x. View

4.
Lin Y, Hsieh H, Lee J, Hsiao C, Lin D, Linacre A . Establishing a DNA identification system for pigs (Sus scrofa) using a multiplex STR amplification. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014; 9:12-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.10.006. View

5.
Vernesi C, Crestanello B, Pecchioli E, Tartari D, Caramelli D, Hauffe H . The genetic impact of demographic decline and reintroduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa): a microsatellite analysis. Mol Ecol. 2003; 12(3):585-95. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01763.x. View