Physicians' Electronic Inbox Work Patterns and Factors Associated with High Inbox Work Duration

Overview

Journal J Am Med Inform Assoc

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2020 Oct 16

PMID 33063087

Citations 23

Authors

Fatema Akbar

Gloria Mark

E Margaret Warton

Mary E Reed

Stephanie Prausnitz

Jeffrey A East

Mark F Moeller

Tracy A Lieu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Electronic health record systems are increasingly used to send messages to physicians, but research on physicians' inbox use patterns is limited. This study's aims were to (1) quantify the time primary care physicians (PCPs) spend managing inboxes; (2) describe daily patterns of inbox use; (3) investigate which types of messages consume the most time; and (4) identify factors associated with inbox work duration.

Materials And Methods: We analyzed 1 month of electronic inbox data for 1275 PCPs in a large medical group and linked these data with physicians' demographic data.

Results: PCPs spent an average of 52 minutes on inbox management on workdays, including 19 minutes (37%) outside work hours. Temporal patterns of electronic inbox use differed from other EHR functions such as charting. Patient-initiated messages (28%) and results (29%) accounted for the most inbox work time. PCPs with higher inbox work duration were more likely to be female (P < .001), have more patient encounters (P < .001), have older patients (P < .001), spend proportionally more time on patient messages (P < .001), and spend more time per message (P < .001). Compared with PCPs with the lowest duration of time on inbox work, PCPs with the highest duration had more message views per workday (200 vs 109; P < .001) and spent more time on the inbox outside work hours (30 minutes vs 9.7 minutes; P < .001).

Conclusions: Electronic inbox work by PCPs requires roughly an hour per workday, much of which occurs outside scheduled work hours. Interventions to assist PCPs in handling patient-initiated messages and results may help alleviate inbox workload.

Citing Articles

Generative artificial intelligence in graduate medical education.

Janumpally R, Nanua S, Ngo A, Youens K Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11:1525604.

PMID: 39867924 PMC: 11758457. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1525604.

From Headache to Handled: Advanced In-Basket Management System in Primary Care Clinics Reduces Provider Workload Burden and Self-Reported Burnout.

Smith L, Kirk W, Bennett M, Youens K, Ramm J Appl Clin Inform. 2024; 15(5):869-876.

PMID: 39442538 PMC: 11498967. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1789575.

Utility of Artificial Intelligence-Generative Draft Replies to Patient Messages.

English E, Laughlin J, Sippel J, DeCamp M, Lin C JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(10):e2438573.

PMID: 39401041 PMC: 11581472. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38573.

Large Language Model-Based Responses to Patients' In-Basket Messages.

Small W, Wiesenfeld B, Brandfield-Harvey B, Jonassen Z, Mandal S, Stevens E JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(7):e2422399.

PMID: 39012633 PMC: 11252893. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22399.

Gender Disparities in Electronic Health Record Usage and Inbasket Burden for Internal Medicine Residents.

Liddell S, Tomasi A, Halvorsen A, Vaa Stelling B, Leasure E J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(15):2904-2909.

PMID: 38926324 PMC: 11576718. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08861-0.

References

Reed M, Graetz I, Gordon N, Fung V . Patient-initiated e-mails to providers: associations with out-of-pocket visit costs, and impact on care-seeking and health. Am J Manag Care. 2016; 21(12):e632-9. View

Innstrand S, Langballe E, Falkum E, Aasland O . Exploring within- and between-gender differences in burnout: 8 different occupational groups. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011; 84(7):813-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00420-011-0667-y. View

Moyer C, Stern D, Katz S, Fendrick A . "We got mail": electronic communication between physicians and patients. Am J Manag Care. 2000; 5(12):1513-22. View

Arndt B, Beasley J, Watkinson M, Temte J, Tuan W, Sinsky C . Tethered to the EHR: Primary Care Physician Workload Assessment Using EHR Event Log Data and Time-Motion Observations. Ann Fam Med. 2017; 15(5):419-426. PMC: 5593724. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2121. View

Murphy D, Meyer A, Russo E, Sittig D, Wei L, Singh H . The Burden of Inbox Notifications in Commercial Electronic Health Records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176(4):559-60. PMC: 4860883. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0209. View

Ouyang D, Chen J, Hom J, Chi J . Internal Medicine Resident Computer Usage: An Electronic Audit of an Inpatient Service. JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 176(2):252-4. PMC: 5951167. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6831. View

Tai-Seale M, Dillon E, Yang Y, Nordgren R, Steinberg R, Nauenberg T . Physicians' Well-Being Linked To In-Basket Messages Generated By Algorithms In Electronic Health Records. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019; 38(7):1073-1078. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05509. View

Crotty B, Tamrat Y, Mostaghimi A, Safran C, Landon B . Patient-to-physician messaging: volume nearly tripled as more patients joined system, but per capita rate plateaued. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33(10):1817-22. PMC: 4418542. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1145. View

Houkes I, Winants Y, Twellaar M, Verdonk P . Development of burnout over time and the causal order of the three dimensions of burnout among male and female GPs. A three-wave panel study. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:240. PMC: 3101180. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-240. View

10.

Reed M, Huang J, Millman A, Graetz I, Hsu J, Brand R . Portal Use Among Patients With Chronic Conditions: Patient-reported Care Experiences. Med Care. 2019; 57(10):809-814. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001178. View

11.

Khairat S, Coleman C, Ottmar P, Bice T, Koppel R, Carson S . Physicians' gender and their use of electronic health records: findings from a mixed-methods usability study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019; 26(12):1505-1514. PMC: 7647147. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz126. View

12.

Lieu T, Altschuler A, Weiner J, East J, Moeller M, Prausnitz S . Primary Care Physicians' Experiences With and Strategies for Managing Electronic Messages. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(12):e1918287. PMC: 6991215. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18287. View

13.

Saag H, Shah K, Jones S, Testa P, Horwitz L . Pajama Time: Working After Work in the Electronic Health Record. J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(9):1695-1696. PMC: 6712097. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05055-x. View

14.

Adler-Milstein J, Holmgren A, Kralovec P, Worzala C, Searcy T, Patel V . Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(6):1142-1148. PMC: 7651985. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocx080. View

15.

Attipoe S, Huang Y, Schweikhart S, Rust S, Hoffman J, Lin S . Factors Associated With Electronic Health Record Usage Among Primary Care Physicians After Hours: Retrospective Cohort Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2019; 6(3):e13779. PMC: 6819131. DOI: 10.2196/13779. View

16.

Car J, Sheikh A . Email consultations in health care: 1--scope and effectiveness. BMJ. 2004; 329(7463):435-8. PMC: 514208. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.329.7463.435. View

17.

Wang J, Ouyang D, Hom J, Chi J, Chen J . Characterizing electronic health record usage patterns of inpatient medicine residents using event log data. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0205379. PMC: 6364867. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205379. View

18.

Lieu T, Freed G . Unbounded-Parent-Physician Communication in the Era of Portal Messaging. JAMA Pediatr. 2019; 173(9):811-812. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.2309. View

19.

Shenson J, Cronin R, Davis S, Chen Q, Jackson G . Rapid growth in surgeons' use of secure messaging in a patient portal. Surg Endosc. 2015; 30(4):1432-40. PMC: 4881849. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4347-y. View

20.

Reed M, Huang J, Brand R, Ballard D, Yamin C, Hsu J . Communicating Through a Patient Portal to Engage Family Care Partners. JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 178(1):142-144. PMC: 5833508. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6325. View