» Articles » PMID: 33061483

The Impacts of Deep Surgical Site Infections on Readmissions, Length of Stay, and Costs: A Matched Case-Control Study Conducted in an Academic Hospital in the Netherlands

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2020 Oct 16
PMID 33061483
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of deep surgical site infections (dSSIs) regarding hospital readmissions, prolonged length of stay (LoS), and estimated costs.

Patients And Methods: We designed and applied a matched case-control observational study using the electronic health records at the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. We compared patients with dSSI and non-SSI, matched on the basis of having similar procedures. A prevailing topology of surgeries categorized as clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty was applied.

Results: Out of a total of 12,285 patients, 393 dSSI were identified as cases, and 2864 patients without SSIs were selected as controls. A total of 343 dSSI patients (87%) and 2307 (81%) controls required hospital readmissions. The median LoS was 7 days (P-P: 2.5-14.5) for dSSI patients and 5 days (P-P: 1-9) for controls (-value: <0.001). The estimated mean cost per hospital admission was €9,016 (SE±343) for dSSI patients and €5,409 (SE±120) for controls (p<0.001). Independent variables associated with dSSI were patient's age ≥65 years (OR: 1.334; 95% CI: 1.036-1.720), the use of prophylactic antibiotics (OR: 0.424; 95% CI: 0.344-0.537), and neoplasms (OR: 2.050; 95% CI: 1.473-2.854).

Conclusion: dSSI is associated with increased costs, prolonged LoS, and increased readmission rates. Elevated risks were seen for elderly patients and those with neoplasms. Additionally, a protective effect of prophylactic antibiotics was found.

Citing Articles

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of surgical site infection prevention among operating room nurses in southwest China.

Feng W, Sae-Sia W, Kitrungrote L Belitung Nurs J. 2023; 8(2):124-131.

PMID: 37521896 PMC: 10386800. DOI: 10.33546/bnj.2018.

References
1.
Saeedinia S, Nouri M, Azarhomayoun A, Hanif H, Mortazavi A, Bahramian P . The incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection after clean spinal operations: A prospective cohort study and review of the literature. Surg Neurol Int. 2015; 6:154. PMC: 4596055. DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.166194. View

2.
Badia J, Casey A, Petrosillo N, Hudson P, Mitchell S, Crosby C . Impact of surgical site infection on healthcare costs and patient outcomes: a systematic review in six European countries. J Hosp Infect. 2017; 96(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.03.004. View

3.
Culver D, Horan T, Gaynes R, Martone W, Jarvis W, Emori T . Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991; 91(3B):152S-157S. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-z. View

4.
Kaye K, Schmit K, Pieper C, Sloane R, Caughlan K, Sexton D . The effect of increasing age on the risk of surgical site infection. J Infect Dis. 2005; 191(7):1056-62. DOI: 10.1086/428626. View

5.
Gheorghe A, Moran G, Duffy H, Roberts T, Pinkney T, Calvert M . Health Utility Values Associated with Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review. Value Health. 2015; 18(8):1126-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.08.004. View