» Articles » PMID: 33037765

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation in Patients with Localised Prostate Cancer: 3-year Outcomes of a Prospective Phase I Study

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2020 Oct 10
PMID 33037765
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To report the 3-year follow-up of a Phase I study of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) in 30 men with localised prostate cancer. Favourable 12-month safety and ablation precision were previously described.

Patients And Methods: As a mandated safety criterion, TULSA was delivered as near whole-gland ablation, applying 3-mm margins sparing 10% of peripheral prostate tissue in 30 men. After 12-month biopsy and MRI, biannual follow-up included prostate-specific antigen (PSA), adverse events (AEs), and functional quality-of-life assessment, with repeat systematic biopsy at 3 years.

Results: A 3-year follow-up was completed by 22 patients. Between 1 and 3 years, there were no new serious or severe AEs. Urinary and bowel function remained stable. Erectile function recovered by 1 year and was stable at 3 years. The PSA level decreased 95% to a median (interquartile range) nadir of 0.33 (0.1-0.4) ng/mL, stable to 0.8 (0.4-1.6) ng/mL at 3 years. Serial biopsies identified clinically significant disease in 10/29 men (34%) and any cancer in 17/29 (59%). By 3 years, seven men had recurrence (four histological, three biochemical) and had undergone salvage therapy without complications (including six prostatectomies). At 3 years, three of 22 men refused biopsy, and two of the 22 (9%) had clinically significant disease (one new, one persistent). Predictors of salvage therapy requirement included less extensive ablation coverage and higher PSA nadir.

Conclusion: With 3-year Phase I follow-up, TULSA demonstrates safe and precise ablation for men with localised prostate cancer, providing predictable PSA and biopsy outcomes, without affecting functional abilities or precluding salvage therapy.

Citing Articles

Cost-utility analysis of MR imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for the treatment of low- to intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer.

Muhler P, Akuamoa-Boateng D, Rosenbrock J, Stock S, Muller D, Heidenreich A BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e088495.

PMID: 39800402 PMC: 11752021. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088495.


MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation (TULSA)-An Emerging Minimally Invasive Treatment Option for Localised Prostate Cancer.

Fung K, Cazzato R, Tricard T, Marini P, Bertucci G, Autrusseau P Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 47(6):689-701.

PMID: 38491163 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03696-y.


Current status and future outlook of ultrasound treatment for prostate cancer.

Shoji S, Naruse J, Oda K, Kuroda S, Umemoto T, Nakajima N J Med Ultrason (2001). 2023; .

PMID: 37787881 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-023-01368-x.


First experiences using transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a promising focal approach to treat localized prostate cancer: a monocentric study.

Peters I, Hensen B, Glandorf J, Gutberlet M, Dohna M, Struckmann S BMC Urol. 2023; 23(1):142.

PMID: 37644453 PMC: 10464407. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01306-6.


Magnetic resonance imaging-guided ultrasound ablation for prostate cancer - A contemporary review of performance.

Alabousi M, Ghai S Front Oncol. 2023; 12:1069518.

PMID: 36686753 PMC: 9846805. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1069518.