» Articles » PMID: 33034835

The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Near-normal Perfusion or Borderline Ischemia on Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 2020 Oct 9
PMID 33034835
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Data on the diagnostic and prognostic value of subtle abnormalities on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) are limited.

Methods And Results: In a retrospective single-center cohort of patients who underwent regadenoson SPECT-MPI, near-normal MPI was defined as normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%) and a summed stress score (SSS) of 1-3 vs SSS = 0 in normal MPI. Borderline ischemia was defined as normal LVEF, SSS = 1-3, and a summed difference score (SDS) of 1 vs SDS = 0 in the absence of ischemia. Coronary angiography data within 6 months from MPI were tabulated. Patients were followed for cardiac death (CD), myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization (CR), and Late CR (LCR) [> 90 days post MPI]. Among 6,802 patients (mean age, 62 ± 13 years; 42% men), followed for a mean of 2.5 ± 2.1 years, 4,398 had normal MPI, 2,404 had near-normal MPI, and 972 had borderline ischemia. Among patients who underwent angiography within 6 months, obstructive (≥ 70% or left main ≥ 50%) CAD was observed at higher rates among subjects with near-normal MPI (33.5% vs 25.5%; P = .049) and those with borderline ischemia (40.5% vs 25.8%; P = .004). During follow-up, 158 (2.3%) CD/MI, 246 (3.6%) CR, and 150 (2.2%) LCR were observed. Near-normal MPI (SSS = 1-3), compared to normal MPI (SSS = 0), was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of the composite endpoint of CD/MI (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], .88-1.66; P = .243) or LCR (HR 1.28; CI .93-1.78; P = .130), but was associated with a significant increase in the risk of CR (HR 1.91; CI 1.49-2.46; P < .001). Borderline ischemia (SDS = 1), compared to no ischemia (SDS = 0), was not associated with a significant difference in the risk of CD/MI [HR 1.09; CI .70-1.69; P = .693], but was associated with a significant increase in the risk of CR (HR 5.62; CI 3.08-10.25; P < .001) and LCR (HR 2.98; CI 1.36-6.53; P = .006).

Conclusion: Near-normal MPI and borderline ischemia on SPECT-MPI provide no significant prognostic information in predicting hard cardiac events but are associated with higher rates of obstructive angiographic CAD and coronary revascularizations.

Citing Articles

Coronary CT angiography alone versus with CT perfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing approaches for chest pain.

DAscenzo F, Faletti R, Di Pietro G, Improta R, Bruno F, Schoepf U Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40055231 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11459-7.


Epicardial fat volume, an independent risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events, had an incremental prognostic value to myocardial perfusion imaging in Chinese populations with suspected or known coronary artery disease with a normal left....

Yang L, Yu W, Wan P, Wang J, Shao X, Zhang F Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1261215.

PMID: 37849937 PMC: 10577423. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1261215.


Age-Specific Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Undergoing Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Megna R, Petretta M, Nappi C, Assante R, Zampella E, Gaudieri V J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(9).

PMID: 37754824 PMC: 10531606. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10090395.


Prognostic utility of Tc-MIBI single photon emission computerized tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with ischemia and non-obstructive coronary artery disease.

Wang X, Li M, Xie F, Liang H, Yang L, Wei X Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1115135.

PMID: 37469480 PMC: 10352836. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1115135.


The Impact of Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction Reduction and Transient Ischemic Dilation in Patients With Normal Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.

Medeiros P, Pereira B, Rodrigues J Cureus. 2023; 14(12):e32950.

PMID: 36712751 PMC: 9875358. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32950.


References
1.
Kattoor A, Kolkailah A, Iskander F, Iskander M, Diep L, Khan R . The prognostic value of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: The largest cohort to date. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020; 28(6):2799-2807. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02135-y. View

2.
Kolkailah A, Iskander M, Iskander F, Patel P, Khan R, Doukky R . The prognostic utility of regadenoson SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease: The largest cohort to date. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020; 29(1):101-110. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02259-1. View

3.
Abidov A, Dilsizian V, Doukky R, Duvall W, Dyke C, Elliott M . Aminophylline shortage and current recommendations for reversal of vasodilator stress: An ASNC information statement endorsed by SCMR. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018; 26(3):1007-1014. PMC: 6517353. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-01548-0. View

4.
Iskander F, Iskander M, Gomez J, Doukky R . Prognostic value of regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle branch block or ventricular paced rhythm. J Nucl Cardiol. 2019; 28(3):967-977. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01762-4. View

5.
Austen W, Edwards J, Frye R, Gensini G, Gott V, Griffith L . A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975; 51(4 Suppl):5-40. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.51.4.5. View