» Articles » PMID: 33031713

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Fibrosis Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: The ALICIA Trial

Abstract

Background: Myocardial fibrosis is key for atrial fibrillation maintenance. We aimed to test the efficacy of ablating cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-detected atrial fibrosis plus pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Methods: This was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with symptomatic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal and persistent) undergoing first or repeat ablation were randomized in a 1:1 basis to receive PVI plus CMR-guided fibrosis ablation (CMR group) or PVI alone (PVI-alone group). The primary end point was the rate of recurrence (>30 seconds) at 12 months of follow-up using a 12-lead ECG and Holter monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months. The analysis was conducted by intention-to-treat.

Results: In total, 155 patients (71% male, age 59±10, CHADS-VASc 1.3±1.1, 54% paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) were allocated to the PVI-alone group (N=76) or CMR group (N=79). First ablation was performed in 80% and 71% of patients in the PVI-alone and CMR groups, respectively. The mean atrial fibrosis burden was 12% (only ≈50% of patients had fibrosis outside the pulmonary vein area). One hundred percent and 99% of patients received the assigned intervention in the PVI-alone and CMR group, respectively. The primary outcome was achieved in 21 patients (27.6%) in the PVI-alone group and 22 patients (27.8%) in the CMR group (odds ratio: 1.01 [95% CI, 0.50-2.04]; =0.976). There were no differences in the rate of adverse events (3 in the CMR group and 2 in the PVI-alone group; =0.68).

Conclusions: A pragmatic ablation approach targeting CMR-detected atrial fibrosis plus PVI was not more effective than PVI alone in an unselected population undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation with low fibrosis burden. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02698631.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of left atrial size and appendage morphology in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation patients.

Pongratz J, Riess L, Hartl S, Brueck B, Tesche C, Olbrich D J Arrhythm. 2025; 41(1):e13224.

PMID: 39866187 PMC: 11757276. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13224.


2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(6):1217-1354.

PMID: 39669937 PMC: 11632303. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13082.


Body mass index as a determinant of scar formation post-AF ablation: Insights from DECAAF II.

Bidaoui G, Tsakiris E, Younes H, Feng H, Assaf A, Chouman N J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024; 35(12):2330-2341.

PMID: 39350356 PMC: 11650536. DOI: 10.1111/jce.16448.


Atrial cardiomyopathy revisited-evolution of a concept: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American....

Goette A, Corradi D, Dobrev D, Aguinaga L, Cabrera J, Chugh S Europace. 2024; 26(9).

PMID: 39077825 PMC: 11431804. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae204.


2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024; 67(5):921-1072.

PMID: 38609733 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01771-5.