» Articles » PMID: 33030871

Risk Factors for Surgical Failure and Worsening Pelvic Floor Symptoms Within 5 Years After Vaginal Prolapse Repair

Overview
Journal Obstet Gynecol
Date 2020 Oct 8
PMID 33030871
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess independent risk factors for surgical failure and worsening pelvic floor symptoms within 5 years after vaginal prolapse surgery.

Methods: This secondary analysis includes OPTIMAL (Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss) (n=374) and E-OPTIMAL (Extended) (n=285) trial participants. Surgical failure was defined as apical descent greater than one third of the total vaginal length, anterior or posterior vaginal wall past the hymen, subsequent surgery or bothersome vaginal bulge. Worsening pelvic floor symptoms were defined as increases from baseline as large as the minimally important difference for subscale scores of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory: 11 for the Urinary Distress Inventory and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory and 34.3 for the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory. Outcomes were measured at 6 months then 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. Chi-square and t test results from bivariate models and clinical relevance were used to inform final models.

Results: Baseline risk factors for surgical failure were Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.17-3.15), perineal body (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.09-1.63), and pretreatment Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28). Risk factors for worsening of pelvic floor symptoms were pretreatment Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94) for worsening Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory score, vaginal deliveries (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.44) and pretreatment Urinary Distress Inventory score (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93) for worsening Urinary Distress Inventory score, and age (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) and pretreatment Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory score (aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98) for worsening Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory score.

Conclusions: Hispanic ethnicity, larger preoperative perineal body, and higher pretreatment Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory scores were risk factors for surgical failure up to 5 years after vaginal prolapse repair. Participants with higher baseline Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory scores were less likely to worsen. Risk factors for worsening Urinary Distress Inventory and Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory scores included more vaginal deliveries and increased age, respectively.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00597935, NCT01166373.

Citing Articles

Impact of preoperative pelvic floor muscle function on the success of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Szymanski J, Starzec-Proserpio M, Bartosinska-Raczkiewicz D, Krawczyk A, Kukulski P, Jakiel G Int Urogynecol J. 2023; 35(1):85-93.

PMID: 37819368 PMC: 10811015. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05653-8.


Association between oxidative balance score and urinary incontinence in females: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey in 2005-2018.

Yuan Y, Tan W, Huang Y, Huang H, Li Y, Gou Y Int Urol Nephrol. 2023; 55(9):2145-2154.

PMID: 37314646 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03665-3.


Association Between Enlarged Genital Hiatus and Composite Surgical Failure After Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.

Bradley M, Sridhar A, Ferrante K, Andy U, Visco A, Florian-Rodriguez M Urogynecology (Phila). 2023; 29(5):479-488.

PMID: 36701331 PMC: 10132998. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001309.


Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.

Richter H, Sridhar A, Nager C, Komesu Y, Harvie H, Zyczynski H Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16.

PMID: 35931131 PMC: 9790026. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.048.

References
1.
Boyles S, Weber A, Meyn L . Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188(1):108-15. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.101. View

2.
Barber M, Kuchibhatla M, Pieper C, Bump R . Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185(6):1388-95. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.118659. View

3.
Dunivan G, Lyons K, Jeppson P, Ninivaggio C, Komesu Y, Alba F . Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage and the Relationship to Genital Hiatus and Perineal Body Measurements. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016; 22(6):497-500. PMC: 5111866. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000323. View

4.
Barber M, Brubaker L, Burgio K, Richter H, Nygaard I, Weidner A . Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2014; 311(10):1023-34. PMC: 4083455. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.1719. View

5.
Vergeldt T, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers K . Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26(11):1559-73. PMC: 4611001. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2695-8. View