» Articles » PMID: 33030597

MyPref: Pilot Study of a Novel Communication and Decision-making Tool for Adolescents and Young Adults with Advanced Cancer

Overview
Specialties Critical Care
Oncology
Date 2020 Oct 8
PMID 33030597
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer report feeling ill-informed about their cancer treatment options. Tools are needed to inform AYAs about treatment choices and amplify the AYA's voice in medical decision-making. We developed MyPref, a conjoint-analysis based tool that quantifies AYA preferences for future cancer treatments.

Methods: We conducted a staged pilot study of MyPref utilizing an intervention mixed methods design. AYAs and their parent or trusted person (PTP) completed MyPref and received a summary report of their preferences for treatment-related factors. Participants later completed the Preparation for Decision Making Scale and MyPref Experience Questionnaire and engaged in semi-structured interviews. Oncologists reported on the perceived accuracy and utility of MyPref. We used a weaving technique for presenting mixed methods data.

Results: Fifteen AYAs with advanced cancer, 7 PTPs, and 12 providers participated in this pilot; 32 (94%) completed all study items. AYA/PTPs stated study participation was useful and believed MyPref allowed for improved understanding of treatment factors and consideration, organization, and visualization of preferences. All providers agreed that MyPref made them think about patient's preferences and 9 (75%) reported they planned to change their approach to discussions about preferences for future treatments.

Conclusion: MyPref is an objective way to estimate AYA and PTP preferences for future treatment characteristics. This novel tool may be a useful way to engage AYAs and PTPs in discussions around preferences for treatment and prepare AYAs for future decision-making. We are currently evaluating this tool longitudinally to determine the impact on actual treatment decisions.

Citing Articles

The implementation and strategy of triadic communication in pediatric oncology: a scoping review.

Ye J, Yang L, Axelin A, Likitalo S, Wen C, Li X Pediatr Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39304788 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03590-w.


Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents.

Gutierrez A, Robinson J, Smith H, Desrosiers-Battu L, Scollon S, Canfield I Genet Med. 2024; 26(8):101168.

PMID: 38767058 PMC: 11534009. DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101168.


Making Use of Technology to Improve Stated Preference Studies.

Vass C, Boeri M, Shields G, Seo J Patient. 2024; 17(5):483-491.

PMID: 38632181 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00693-8.


Mixed-method examination of factors associated with adolescent decision-making and involvement in care in the context of advanced cancer.

Sutherland-Foggio M, Olsavsky A, Skeens M, Nahata L, Hill K, Schaefer M Palliat Support Care. 2024; :1-8.

PMID: 38353006 PMC: 11360869. DOI: 10.1017/S1478951524000026.


Palliative Care Interventions Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review.

Newman A, Kenney A, Witkowski E, Karst J, Lerret S, Davies W Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2023; 11(3):262-273.

PMID: 37753528 PMC: 10519447. DOI: 10.1037/cpp0000486.


References
1.
Fraenkel L, Chodkowski D, Lim J, Garcia-Tsao G . Patients' preferences for treatment of hepatitis C. Med Decis Making. 2009; 30(1):45-57. PMC: 2812601. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09341588. View

2.
Dussel V, Orellana L, Soto N, Chen K, Ullrich C, Kang T . Feasibility of Conducting a Palliative Care Randomized Controlled Trial in Children With Advanced Cancer: Assessment of the PediQUEST Study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015; 49(6):1059-69. PMC: 4530789. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.12.010. View

3.
Snaman J, Blazin L, Holder R, Wolfe J, Baker J . Identifying and Quantifying Adolescent and Young Adult Patient Preferences in Cancer Care: Development of a Conjoint Analysis-Based Decision-Making Tool. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018; 8(2):212-216. DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0116. View

4.
Elwyn G, OConnor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A . Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006; 333(7565):417. PMC: 1553508. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. View

5.
Bennett C, Graham I, Kristjansson E, Kearing S, Clay K, OConnor A . Validation of a preparation for decision making scale. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 78(1):130-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.012. View